Extinction of innate floral preferences in the pollinator Eristalis tenax
Mishra, A.; Rajan, D. H.; Sharan, M.; Gharpure, G.; Olsson, S.
Show abstract
Innate behaviors allow solitary animals to complete essential tasks in the absence of social learning. However, we know little about the degree to which ecologically relevant innate preferences can change. The hoverfly Eristalis tenax, a solitary generalist pollinator, is an ideal model for studying innate behavior in a naturalistic context because its survival depends on the innate ability to identify flowers. Innate behavior in E. tenax has previously been considered inalterable, but we hypothesized that E. tenax can modulate their innate behavior after training in a multimodal sensory context, in contrast to the prior work that employed unimodal sensory cues. To test this, we examined if E. tenax can extinguish an innate proboscis extension response (PER) to a multimodal floral object after undergoing aversive conditioning with quinine, and if flies can acquire PER to an innately unattractive object using sucrose as reinforcement. Finally, we assessed long-term memory retention. Here, we report a complete extinction of the proboscis extension response (PER) to an innately attractive floral object following aversive training. E. tenax can also acquire PER to an innately unattractive object after appetitive training. Flies can retain these memories for days after training, and aversive memories last longer than appetitive memories. Our results contrast with literature stating that innate preferences cannot be extinguished in E. tenax. This could be because our study uses multimodal objects instead of the unimodal stimuli used in previous work. Ultimately, these findings improve our understanding of how animals navigate the uncertainties of dynamic objects in the natural world.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Social foraging extends associative odor-food memory expression in an automated learning assay for Drosophila melanogaster 96%
- Bumblebees learn to use peripheral taste to predict the presence of nectar in flowers 96%
- Behavior choices amongst grooming, feeding, and courting in Drosophila show contextual flexibility, not an absolute hierarchy of needs 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Drosophila's sensory responses to bacterial peptidoglycan integrates positive and negative signals 96%
- Warm periods in repeated cold stresses protect Drosophila against ionoregulatory collapse, chilling injury, and reproductive deficits 95%
- Thermal boldness: Volunteer exploration of extreme temperatures in Drosophila melanogaster 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Does bumblebee preference of continuous over interrupted strings in string-pulling tasks indicate means-end comprehension? 95%
- Ir56d-dependent fatty acid responses in Drosophila uncovers taste discrimination between different classes of fatty acids 95%
- How honey bees make fast and accurate decisions 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reward Value Is More Important Than Physical Saliency During Bumblebee Visual Search For Multiple Rewarding Targets 94%
- Trapline foraging by nectar-collecting hornets 94%
- Geometry-based navigation in the dark: Layout symmetry facilitates spatial learning in the house cricket, Acheta domesticus, in the absence of visual cues 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Avoiding pitfalls: Trace conditioning and rapid aversive learning during route navigation in desert ants 93%
- Multisensory integration in Anopheles mosquito swarms: The role of visual and acoustic information in mate tracking and collision avoidance 92%
- Snow flies self-amputate freezing limbs to sustain behavior at sub-zero temperatures 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.