Back

Selective preservation of fucose-rich oligosaccharides in the North Atlantic Ocean

Bligh, M.; Buck-Wiese, H.; Sichert, A.; Bercovici, S. K.; Hellige, I.; Marchant, H.; Iversen, M.; Sauer, U.; Dittmar, T.; Arnosti, C.; Liebeke, M.; Hehemann, J.-H.

2024-09-24 ecology
10.1101/2024.09.20.613644 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The ocean has a substantial capacity to store carbon dioxide fixed via photosynthesis in dissolved organic molecules. An estimated 20% of the 660 Gt dissolved organic carbon in the ocean pool consists of structurally uncharacterized oligosaccharides, which appear to resist microbial degradation (Aluwihare et al., 1997). Current technologies lack the sensitivity and molecular resolution to identify these oligosaccharides. Here, we adapted graphitized carbon chromatography to extract and separate marine oligosaccharides for liquid chromatography high resolution mass spectrometry analysis. Using a newly-developed de novo annotation tool, we found 110 oligosaccharide structures in surface and deep ocean seawater at two distant locations in the North Atlantic Ocean. One group of the detected oligosaccharides was found only in surface seawater and consisted of larger and more abundant molecules detected by our analysis. A second group of smaller, less abundant oligosaccharides was detected in both the surface and deep ocean seawater of both sampled locations. The composition of oligosaccharides differed between the surface and deep ocean, with deep ocean samples relatively enriched in hard-to-metabolize deoxy-sugars, and xylose, amino sugars and uronic acids compared to simple hexoses. Notably the deoxy-sugar fucose constituted 35-40% of the monomers in deep-sea oligosaccharides, twice the percentage in surface ocean oligosaccharides. The ubiquity of deep ocean oligosaccharides indicates that they represent a preserved fraction of the carbohydrate pool. Their enrichment in specific monosaccharides suggests selective preservation of fucose-rich oligosaccharides in the deep ocean.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.