Improved precision oncology question-answering using agentic LLM
Das, R.; Maheswari, K.; Siddiqui, S.; Arora, N.; Paul, A.; Nanshi, J.; Udbalkar, V.; Sarvade, A.; Chaturvedi, H.; Shvartsman, T.; Masih, S.; Thippeswamy, R.; Patil, S.; Nirni, S. S.; Garsson, B.; Bandyopadhyay, S.; Maulik, U.; Farooq, M.; Sengupta, D.
Show abstract
The clinical adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) in biomedical research has been limited by concerns regarding the quality, accuracy, and reliability of their outputs, particularly in precision oncology, where clinical decision-making demands high precision. Current models, often based on fine-tuned foundational LLMs, are prone to issues such as hallucinations, incoherent reasoning, and loss of context. In this work, we present GeneSilico Copilot, an advanced agent-based architecture that transforms LLMs from simple response synthesizers to clinical reasoning systems. Our approach is centred around a bespoke ReAct agent that orchestrates a suite of specialized tools for asynchronous information retrieval and synthesis. These tools access curated document vector stores containing clinical treatment guidelines, genomic insights, drug information, clinical trials, and breast cancer-specific literature. To leverage large context windows of current LLMs, we implement a hybrid search strategy that prioritizes key information and dynamically integrates summarized content, reducing context fragmentation. Incorporating additional metadata further allows for precise, transparent and evidence-backed reasoning at each step of the thought process. The system ensures that at every stage, the agent can synthesize meaningful, context-aware observations that contribute to a coherent and comprehensive final response that aligns with clinical standards. Evaluations on real-world breast cancer cases show that GeneSilico Copilot significantly improves response accuracy and personalization. This system represents a critical advancement toward making LLMs clinically deployable in precision oncology and has potential applications in broader medical domains requiring complex, data-driven decision-making.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- DeepPhe-CR: Natural Language Processing Software Services for Cancer Registrar Case Abstraction 96%
- NCT Precision Oncology Thesaurus Drugs – a Curated Database for Drugs, Drug Classes, and Drug Targets in Precision Cancer Medicine 94%
- Exploring Integrative Analysis using the BioMedical Evidence Graph 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- AI-HOPE: An AI-Driven conversational agent for enhanced clinical and genomic data integration in precision medicine research 96%
- preon: Fast and accurate entity normalization for drug names and cancer types in precision oncology 95%
- ARAX: a graph-based modular reasoning tool for translational biomedicine 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The role of natural language processing in cancer care: a systematic scoping review with narrative synthesis 93%
- Comparing neural language models for medical concept representation and patient trajectory prediction 92%
- Enriching Representation Learning Using 53 Million Patient Notes through Human Phenotype Ontology Embedding 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.