Back

Signals reported to Rucaparib: An Updated Comprehensive Disproportionality Analysis Using FDA Adverse Event Reporting System

Sharma, A.; Adusumilli, P. K.

2024-09-23 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.1101/2024.09.20.24314057 medRxiv
Show abstract

Ovarian cancer currently ranks as the fourth most common cancer. This cancer is metastatic in nature and making it more challenging to manage. Prostate cancer is the one of the major causes of disease and death among men. Approximately 1.6 million men are diagnosed with prostate cancer. Rucaparib, a poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitor has been approved by United States Food and Drug Administration for management of ovarian cancer and prostate cancer. Rucaparib was approved by US Food and Drug Administration in the year 2016 for the treatment of ovarian cancer and 2020 for the treatment of prostate cancer. To assess the potential association between rucaparib and the identified signals, a disproportionality analysis of spontaneous reports is being conducted. Reports were taken from FAERS data base and retrospective case/non case study was conducted. Reporting Odds ratio (ROR), Relative Reporting Ratio (RRR), Chi Squared Value ({chi}2) and Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) and Drug Event (DE) were used to perform disproportionality analysis. 144 signals were considered as positive adverse drug reactions using the criteria {chi}2 >4, PRR >2, ROR >2 and DE [≥] 3. Through disproportionality analysis of the FAERS data, signal was identified between the signals-increased prostate specific antigen, decreased serum magnesium levels, decreased glomerular filtration rates, blood iron decreased and vitamin d decreased and rucaparib. The current investigation indicated that rucaparib may increase the incidence of the identified signals.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.4%
2
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
3
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
4
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.4%
6
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
7
JMIRx Med
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.1%
9
Clinical and Translational Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
10
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
11
PROTEOMICS
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
12
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
13
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
14
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
15
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
17
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
68 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
Pharmaceutics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
Pharmaceuticals
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
21
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
22
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
23
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
BioData Mining
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
25
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
26
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%