Effect of non-drug Intervention on Cognitive Function and Blood Sugar Control of Type 2 diabetes Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A meta-analysis Protocol
Wenhao, S.; Yanru, W.; Hairong, J.; Luo, Y.; Xueling, L.; Jiaqi, Z.; Zhaoyang, W.; Pepertual, T.
Show abstract
This study aims to assess non-drug therapies safety and effectiveness on cognitive function and blood glucose control of type 2 diabetes with mild cognitive impairment (T2DM-MCI) patients in randomized controlled trials by meta-analysis, providing constructive evidence for non-drug treatment decision-making. The system review plan will strictly follow the Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols entry for reporting. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, CNKI, WANGFANG Database, and SinoMed will be systematically searched with Chinese and English language restrictions, and all randomized controlled trials comparing non-drug treatment with usual care or no intervention or placebo to study cognitive impairment in T2DM-MCI patients will be included. We will also manually search for cited literature. Our primary outcomes are cognitive function and blood sugar control. The risk of bias will be assessed for all studies using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2) for Systematic Review of Intervention-version 5.1.0. Where possible, meta-analysis using random-effects models will be performed, otherwise, a qualitative summary will be provided. We will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-P) guidelines. This meta-analysis compares the efficacy of non-drug interventions for mild cognitive impairment in type 2 diabetes mellitus. It will provide reliable evidence for patients, clinicians, and researchers. The methodological protocol was in registered in the PROSPERO (CRD 42024496248).
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy and safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists versus SGLT-2 inhibitors in overweight/obese patients with or without diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis 95%
- Digital game-based interventions for cognitive training in healthy adults and adults with cognitive impairment: Protocol for a two-part systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for postpartum hypogalactia: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: Clinical outcomes due to COVID-19. Protocol of a systematic literature review 96%
- Effectiveness of aerobic physical exercise on depression symptoms in adults: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials 95%
- Efficacy of Acupuncture on Lower Limb Motor Dysfunction Following Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence-Based, Cost-Effective Interventions To Suppress The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 92%
- Repurposing Existing Medications for Coronavirus Disease 2019: Protocol for a Rapid and Living Systematic Review 91%
- Prevalence of mental health illness in Nigeria: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Erroneous risks in pharmaceutical versus non-pharmaceutical interventions during data extraction in evidence synthesis practice: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial 96%
- A Retrospective Analysis of Serious Adverse Events and Deaths in US-Based Lifestyle Clinical Trials for Cognitive Health 94%
- Plant Formulation ATRICOV 452 in Improving the Level of COVID-19 Specific Inflammatory Markers in Patients 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multicenter preclinical studies as an innovative method to enhance translation: a systematic review of published studies 93%
- The Proportion of Randomized Controlled Trials That Inform Clinical Practice: A Longitudinal Cohort Study of Trials Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov 91%
- The effect of calcium supplementation in people under 35 years old: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.