Back

The Role of Purine Interactions in Biogenic Crystal Shape Determination

Rothkegel, J.; Kaufmann, S.; Wilsch-Braeuninger, M.; Mateus, R.

2024-09-19 biophysics
10.1101/2024.09.18.613275 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Widespread through phyla, purine crystals are intracellular inclusions serving a myriad of organismal functions. In zebrafish, iridophores concentrate purines in membrane-bound organelles, the iridosomes, for controlled crystallization. These crystals assemble into large, flat, and thin hexagons following unknown mechanisms that evolve against thermodynamically favorable interactions. Here, we investigate the initial development of zebrafish iridosomal crystals. By performing in vivo confocal reflection imaging, cryoFIB-SEM, and establishing novel 2D and 3D analysis pipelines, we show that these crystals grow four times faster along the b-crystallographic axis, leading to their characteristic hexagonal shape. By analyzing zebrafish with impaired guanine production, while conducting crystal growth simulations, we find that crystal shape is directed by bond type, number, and interaction strength between purines. Mechanistically, the macroscopic shape of zebrafish crystals is controlled by the relative concentration of purines present in the iridosome. This process impacts crystal growth along the b-axis, by disrupting the crystals in-plane hydrogen bond structure, without alteration of the other axes. Our work uncovers a layer of biogenic crystal growth regulation occurring in vertebrate biocrystallization processes. HighlightsO_LIZebrafish iridophores actively regulate crystal size and shape within iridosomes C_LIO_LIIn vivo crystal (100) facet grows [~]4m{superscript 2} in 24 hours C_LIO_LILength of crystallographic b-axis is controlled by purine molecular interactions C_LIO_LISize of c- and a-axes is regulated independently of b-axis C_LI O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=180 SRC="FIGDIR/small/613275v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (46K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1946819org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@3e6d34org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@737212org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1462501_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Published in Small Methods (predicted rank #21) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.