Summary Estimates Derived from a Multi-state Non-Markov Framework to Characterize the Course of Heart Disease
Ding, M.; Lin, F.-C.; Meyer, M. L.
Show abstract
Multi-state Markov models have been used to model the course of chronic disease. However, they are unsuitable to chronic disease where past and present states interplay and affect future states, and the estimated transition probabilities are time-specific which are not straightforward for public health interpretation. We have proposed a multi-state non-Markov framework that splits disease states into substates conditioning on past states. As the substates track past states and indicate multimorbidity, the estimated transition rates can be used to derive two summary estimates: Disease path which shows path of state transition, and multimorbidity-adjusted life year (MALY) which represents the adjusted life year in full health. In this paper, we showed the derivation of the two summary estimates and applied them to characterize the course of heart disease using data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC) study. The course of heart disease was modeled in five states, namely, healthy, at metabolic risk, coronary heart disease (CHD), heart failure, and mortality. In this mid- to old-age population, the estimated MALY was 24.13 (95% CI: 16.55, 32.06) years. For healthy participants at baseline, the most likely disease paths were: "Healthy [->] at metabolic risk [->] mortality" (37%), "Healthy [->] mortality" (21%), "Healthy [->] at metabolic risk [->] heart failure [->] mortality" (19%), and "Healthy [->] at metabolic risk [->] CHD [->] mortality" (8%). The MALY was higher among women than men and higher among Whites than Blacks. The distribution of disease path was similar across sex and race subgroups. In summary, MALY and disease path characterize the disease course in a summary manner and have potential use in chronic disease prevention.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Social Networks and Cardiovascular Disease Events in the Jackson Heart Study 93%
- Association of Cardiologist Clinic Visits with Cardiovascular Primary Prevention Outcomes Among People with HIV from Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Groups in the Southern United States 92%
- Walking pace optimizes conventional cardiovascular disease risk prediction models among vulnerable subpopulations: a prospective cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The US Midlife Mortality Crisis Continues: Excess Cause-Specific Mortality During 2020 92%
- Potential Biases in Test-Negative Design Studies of COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Arising from the Inclusion of Asymptomatic Individuals 90%
- How Timing of Stay-at-home Orders and Mobility Reductions Impacted First-Wave COVID-19 Deaths in US Counties 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Validation of the Michigan Chronic Disease Simulation Model (MICROSIM) 94%
- Actionable absolute risk prediction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a behavior-management approach based on data from 464,547 UK Biobank participants 93%
- Economic Evaluation of Hypertension screening in Iran using Markov model 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying absolute treatment effect heterogeneity for time-to-event outcomes across different risk strata: divergence of conclusions with risk difference and restricted mean survival difference 92%
- Causes of Outcome Learning: A causal inference-inspired machine learning approach to disentangling common combinations of potential causes of a health outcome 90%
- Estimation of time-varying causal effects with multivariable Mendelian randomization: some cautionary notes 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nationwide prediction of type 2 diabetes comorbidities 92%
- Risk factors for severe COVID-19 differ by age: a retrospective study of hospitalized adults 92%
- Can machine learning improve risk prediction of incident hypertension? An internal method comparison and external validation of the Framingham risk model using HUNT Study data 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.