Back

Beyond the Spectrum: Subtype-Specific Molecular Insights into Autism Spectrum Disorder Via Integrated Transcriptomic Analysis

Zahiri, J.; Mirzaie, M.; Duan, K.; Xiao, Y.; Aamodt, C.; Nazari, S.; Andreason, C.; Lopez, L.; Barnes, C.; Arias, S.; Nalabolu, S.; Pierce, K.; Lewis, N.; Courchesne, E.

2024-09-19 pediatrics
10.1101/2024.09.17.24313857 medRxiv
Show abstract

Some toddlers with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have mild social symptoms and developmental improvement in skills, but for others, symptoms and abilities are moderately or even severely affected. Those with profound autism have the most severe social, language, and cognitive symptoms and are at the greatest risk of having a poor developmental outcome. The little that is known about the underlying biology of this important profound autism subtype, points clearly to embryonic dysregulation of proliferation, differentiation and neurogenesis. Because it is essential to gain foundational knowledge of the molecular biology associated with profound, moderate, and mild autism clinical subtypes, we used well-validated, data-driven patient subtyping methods to integrate clinical and molecular data at 1 to 3 years of age in a cohort of 363 ASD and controls representative of the general pediatric population in San Diego County. Clinical data were diagnostic, language, cognitive and adaptive ability scores. Molecular measures were 50 MSigDB Hallmark gene pathway activity scores derived from RNAseq gene expression. Subtyping identified four ASD, typical and mixed diagnostic clusters. 93% of subjects in one cluster were profound autism and 93% in a different cluster were control toddlers; a third cluster was 76% moderate ability ASD; and the last cluster was a mix of mild ASD and control toddlers. Among the four clusters, the profound autism subtype had the most severe social symptoms, language, cognitive, adaptive, social attention eye tracking, social fMRI activation, and age-related decline in abilities, while mild autism toddlers mixed within typical and delayed clusters had mild social symptoms, and neurotypical language, cognitive and adaptive scores that improved with age compared with profound and moderate autism toddlers in other clusters. In profound autism, 7 subtype-specific dysregulated gene pathways were found; they control embryonic proliferation, differentiation, neurogenesis, and DNA repair. To find subtype-common dysregulated pathways, we compared all ASD vs TD and found 17 ASD subtype-common dysregulated pathways. These common pathways showed a severity gradient with the greatest dysregulation in profound and least in mild. Collectively, results raise the new hypothesis that the continuum of ASD heterogeneity is moderated by subtype-common pathways and the distinctive nature of profound autism is driven by the differentially added profound subtype-specific embryonic pathways.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.3%
2
Autism Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
3
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.7%
5
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.3%
6
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
7
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
8
JAMA Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
9
npj Genomic Medicine
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
10
Biological Psychiatry
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
14
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Molecular Autism
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.3%
17
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
20
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
21
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.6%
22
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%