Back

Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Findings from Real-World Data using AI-Powered Outcomes

Prakash, S.; Coleman, J.

2024-09-18 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.1101/2024.09.17.24313797
Show abstract

BackgroundThe SELECT trial showed cardiovascular benefits of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in obese patients with cardiovascular disease; however, real-world data (RWD) on this benefit remain limited. This study used an artificial intelligence (AI)-generated algorithm and multimodal RWD to evaluate the impact of GLP-1 RAs on cardiovascular disease risk in a population of obese patients with and without preexisting cardiovascular disease. MethodsUsing data from the Dandelion Health RWD library, an Emulated SELECT Cohort was created to include obese patients similar to those in the SELECT trial, but with and without preexisting cardiovascular disease. An AI algorithm developed by Pheiron that used 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) as a predictive biomarker for the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was validated and used to derive MACE risk scores for the Emulated SELECT Cohort. These outcomes were compared over time between patients who used GLP-1 RAs and non-users using inverse-probability weighted linear regression models, adjusting for key covariates. ResultsOut-of-sample validation showed high predictive accuracy of the AI algorithm, with ROC AUCs of 0.81 for myocardial infarction (MI) and 0.75 for stroke. Increased risk scores from the algorithm were correlated with higher MACE incidence in RWD. In the Emulated SELECT Cohort of 20,795 patients, GLP-1 RA use was associated with significant attenuation of MACE risk, with reductions observed in percentile risk score for MI (4%; p<0.001) and stroke (3.6%; p<0.001) per year of use. Differences in GLP-1 RA and non-GLP-1 users were evident as early as 1.7 years, with a 15-20% difference in absolute MACE risk scores between GLP-1 RA users and non-users observed by the end of the study. ConclusionAn AI algorithm using 12-lead ECGs accurately predicted MACE risk and could be used to model risk attenuation associated with GLP-1 RA use. Using this outcome, we find that GLP-1 RA use was associated with significant reductions in MI and stroke risk, in a broader population and within a shorter timeframe than the SELECT trial. These findings suggest potentially significant cardioprotective benefits of GLP-1 RAs in real-world settings and demonstrate a proof-of-concept for utilizing clinical AI to understand these benefits.

Matching journals

1
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Wiley · based on 19 published papers
Top 0.2%
116× avg
2
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Wiley · based on 14 published papers
#1
161× avg
3
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 14%
2.2× avg
4
Clinical and Translational Science
Wiley · based on 14 published papers
#1
88× avg
5
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 67%
5.3%
6
PLOS Medicine
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 95 published papers
Top 2%
8.9× avg
7
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Wiley · based on 21 published papers
Top 0.6%
24× avg
8
Journal of the American Heart Association
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 92 published papers
Top 6%
3.8× avg
9
Nature Communications
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 483 published papers
Top 21%
2.9%
10
Atherosclerosis
Elsevier BV · based on 16 published papers
Top 1%
19× avg
11
Trials
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 24 published papers
Top 1%
16× avg
12
BMJ
BMJ · based on 49 published papers
Top 2%
9.7× avg
13
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 30 published papers
Top 3%
7.4× avg
14
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 99 published papers
Top 11%
2.5× avg
15
npj Digital Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 85 published papers
Top 9%
2.1× avg
16
Diabetologia
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 23 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
17
eLife
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd · based on 262 published papers
Top 28%
0.8%
18
Circulation
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 37 published papers
Top 5%
2.7× avg
19
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Elsevier BV · based on 37 published papers
Top 5%
3.3× avg
20
JMIRx Med
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 29 published papers
Top 5%
4.0× avg
21
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
BMJ · based on 10 published papers
Top 2%
12× avg
22
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
Top 1%
13× avg
23
International Journal of Obesity
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 17 published papers
Top 3%
6.0× avg
24
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 219 published papers
Top 21%
0.7%
25
The Lancet Digital Health
Elsevier BV · based on 25 published papers
Top 5%
3.7× avg