Back

Prediction and functional interpretation of inter-chromosomal genome architecture from DNA sequence with TwinC

Jha, A.; Hristov, B.; Wang, X.; Wang, S.; Greenleaf, W.; Kundaje, A.; Aiden, E. L.; Bertero, A.; Noble, W. S.

2024-09-21 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.09.16.613355 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Three-dimensional nuclear DNA architecture comprises well-studied intra-chromosomal (cis) folding and less characterized inter-chromosomal (trans) interfaces. Current predictive models of 3D genome folding can effectively infer pairwise cis-chromatin interactions from the primary DNA sequence but generally ignore trans contacts. There is an unmet need for robust models of trans-genome organization that provide insights into their underlying principles and functional relevance. We present TwinC, an interpretable convolutional neural network model that reliably predicts trans contacts measurable through proximity ligation-dependent (in situ and intact Hi-C) and independent (DNA SPRITE) genome-wide chromatin conformation assays.. TwinC uses a paired sequence design from replicate Hi-C experiments to learn single base pair relevance in trans interactions across two stretches of DNA. The method achieves high predictive accuracy (AUROC=0.80) on a cross-chromosomal test set from in situ and intact Hi-C experiments in heart tissue. Furthermore, we train TwinC using in situ Hi-C data from the widely used GM12878 cell line and validate its performance with orthogonal DNA SPRITE assay in the same cell type. Mechanistically, the neural network learns the importance of compartments, chromatin accessibility, clustered transcription factor binding and G-quadruplexes in forming trans contacts. In summary, TwinC models and interprets trans genome architecture, shedding light on this poorly understood aspect of gene regulation.

Published in Nature Communications (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.