Cryo-EM structures of PP2A:B55-Eya3 and PP2A:B55-p107 define PP2A:B55 substrate recruitment
Padi, S. K.; Godek, R. J.; Peti, W.; Page, R.
Show abstract
The phosphoprotein phosphatase (PPP) family of ser/thr phosphatases are responsible for the majority of all ser/thr dephosphorylation in cells. However, unlike their kinase counterpart, they do not achieve specificity via phosphosite recognition sequences, but instead bind substrates and regulators using PPP-specific short linear and/or helical motifs (SLiMs, SHelMs). Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) is a highly conserved PPP that regulates cell signaling and is a tumor suppressor. Here, we investigate the mechanisms of substrate and regulator recruitment to the PP2A:B55 holoenzyme to define how substrates and regulators engage B55 and understand, in turn, how these interactions direct phosphosite dephosphorylation. Our cryo-EM structures of PP2A:B55 bound to p107 (substrate) and Eya3 (regulator), coupled with biochemical, biophysical and cell biology assays, show that while B55 associates using a common set of interaction pockets, the mechanisms of substrate and regulator binding can differ substantially. This shows that B55-mediated substrate recruitment is distinct from that observed for PP2A:B56 and other PPPs. It also allowed us to identify the core B55 recruitment motif in Eya3 proteins, a sequence we show is conserved amongst the Eya family. Finally, using NMR-based dephosphorylation assays, we also showed how B55 recruitment directs PP2A:B55 fidelity, via the selective dephosphorylation of specific phosphosites. Because of the key regulatory functions of PP2A:B55 in mitosis and DNA damage repair, these data provide a roadmap for pursuing new avenues to therapeutically target this complex by individually blocking a subset of regulators that use different B55 interaction sites.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.