A Hopfield network model of neuromodulatory arousal state
Osman, M. A. M.; Fox, K.; Stern, J. I.
Show abstract
Neural circuits display both input-driven activity that is necessary for the real-time control of behavior and internally generated activity that is necessary for memory, planning, and other cognitive processes. A key mediator between these intrinsic and evoked dynamics is arousal, an internal state variable that determines an animals level of engagement with its environment. It has been hypothesized that arousal state acts through neuromodulatory gain control mechanisms that suppress recurrent connectivity and amplify bottom-up input. In this paper, we instantiate this longstanding idea in a continuous Hopfield network embellished with a gain parameter that mimics arousal state by suppressing recurrent interactions between the networks units. We show that dynamics capturing some essential effects of arousal state at the neural and cognitive levels emerge in this simple model as a single parameter--recurrent gain--is varied. Using the models formal connections to the Boltzmann machine and the Ising model, we offer functional interpretations of arousal state rooted in Bayesian inference and statistical physics. Finally, we liken the dynamics of neuromodulator release to an annealing schedule that facilitates adaptive behavior in ever-changing environments. In summary, we present a minimal neural network model of arousal state that exhibits rich but analytically tractable emergent behavior and reveals conceptually clarifying parallels between arousal state and seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- On the physiological and structural contributors to the overall balance of excitation and inhibition in local cortical networks 97%
- A next-generation neural mass model with neuromodulation 97%
- Temporal filters in response to presynaptic spike trains: Interplay of cellular, synaptic and short-term plasticity time scales 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.