Modality specific memory enhancement in Heliconius butterflies
Hodge, E.; Alcalde Anton, A.; Bestea, L.; Hernandez, G.; Aguilar, J. M.; Farnworth, M. S.; Dell'Aglio, D. D.; McMillan, W. O.; Montgomery, S. H.
Show abstract
How animals perceive, process and respond to environmental cues is tightly tuned to the species-specific demands, and reflected by the structure of neural systems. In the Neotropical butterflies, Heliconius, the mushroom bodies, insect learning and memory centres, are significantly expanded compared to their closest relatives. This expansion coincided with the evolution of a novel diet, pollen feeding, and a spatial foraging behaviour consistent with trap-lining. Previous research has shown that Heliconius have more accurate visual long-term memory than other Heliconiini. Here, we tested whether this enhanced memory stability is specific to visual cues by conducting a long-term olfactory memory assay in two Heliconius species and two outgroup species. We found no differences in the long-term olfactory memory between Heliconius species and the outgroup species. Combining data from olfactory and visual memory trials confirms a significant shift in performance among sensory modalities between Heliconius and outgroup genera. In contrast, tests of how Heliconiini prioritise olfactory and visual cues when in presented in conflict also show no consistent shift in attentiveness to sensory cues between species. Our data provide a rare case where memory performance has been compared across species and sensory modalities, to identify evidence of a modality specific shift.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain size predicts learning abilities in bees 95%
- Intergenerational shifts in innate odour preferences upon odour injections in Bicyclus anynana butterfly larvae 94%
- Nasonia vitripennis males exhibit greater effort and competency in detecting hosts with conspecific females than other Nasonia males. 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.