Neural and verbal responses to attachment-schema narratives differ based on past and current caregiving experiences
Lee, C. S.; Cohen, S. S.; Hutchinson, S.; Tottenham, N.; Baldassano, C.
Show abstract
We investigated how past and current caregiving experiences impacted emotional event processing by examining inter-subject functional correlation in 7- to 15-year-olds during narrative movies depicting separation and reunion. Early adversity impacted amygdala interactions with the hippocampus, but medial prefrontal-amygdala connectivity and the content of later recall was shaped by attachment security to current caregivers. This suggests that current attachment can have a redemptive effect on attachment schemas formed in early childhood.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain-Environment Alignment during Movie Watching Predicts Cognitive-Affective Function in Adulthood 95%
- Enhanced Mirror Neuron Network Activity and Effective Connectivity during Live Interaction Among Female Subjects 95%
- Hippocampal-cortical functional connectivity during memory encoding and retrieval 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Infant attachment does not depend on neonatal amygdala and hippocampal structure and connectivity 96%
- A Subset of Cortical Areas Exhibit Adult-like Functional Network Patterns in Early Childhood 94%
- Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of family income-to-needs ratio with cortical and subcortical brain volume in adolescent boys and girls 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Studying the precuneus reveals structure-function-affect correlation in long-term meditators 94%
- Default and Control networks connectivity dynamics track the stream of affect at multiple timescales 94%
- Graph analysis of the guilt network highlights associations with subclinical anxiety and self-blame 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.