Back

Circulating Biomarkers as Predictors of Improvement in Physical Function in Hospitalized Older Adults with Geriatric Syndromes: Findings from the REHAB-HF Trial

Damluji, A.; Bruce, S. A.; Reeves, G.; Pastva, A. M.; Bertoni, A. G.; Mentz, R. J.; Whellan, D.; Kitzman, D.; deFilippi, C. R.

2024-09-15 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.09.13.24313662 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionCirculating biomarkers play an important role in patients with heart failure (HF) for risk stratification and mechanistic insights. We aimed to examine if a diverse set of biomarkers in the REHAB-HF trial would predict improvement in physical function following a 12-week tailored physical therapy rehabilitation intervention compared to attention control. MethodsThe study population consisted of participants [&ge;]60 years of age who were hospitalized with acute HF and randomized to a subsequent multidomain outpatient physical rehabilitation intervention vs. attention control with outcomes of 12-week functional change including the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and six-minute walk distance (6MWD). Blood was collected prior to randomization and at 12-weeks for cardiac, renal, and inflammatory biomarkers. Linear trends across progressively higher biomarker values versus improvement in functional outcomes based on treatment assignment were evaluated. Classification and regression trees (CART) were created to estimate optimal biomarker levels associated with differential improvement in the two functional outcomes. ResultsA total of 242 of 349 participants (69%) had baseline biomarkers measured. In an adjusted regression model, higher baseline cardiac troponin (cTn) I and T were associated with greater gains in SPPB and 6MWD respectively with the rehabilitation intervention (P=0.04 and 0.03 for interaction) versus attention control. In the CART analysis of the physical rehabilitation and attention control participants, those with baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) [&ge;]9.9 mg/L and hs-cTnT [&ge;]36 ng/L receiving the rehabilitation intervention had a 129 m (95% CI 78-180m) greater 12-week 6MWD increase vs attention control. In contrast, for participants with CRP<9.9 mg/L there was no significant incremental 6MWD difference (30m, 95% CI -0.5m, 60.2m). For SPPB, a CRP [&ge;]9.9 mg/L and creatinine [&ge;]1.4 mg/dL optimally identified a differential improvement with the rehabilitation intervention versus attention control. The biomarkers (except for creatinine) decreased by 12 weeks post hospitalization but with no differences based on treatment assignment. ConclusionHigher baseline levels of biomarkers of inflammation, cardiac injury, and renal dysfunction identified older adults after a HF hospitalization with the greatest differential improvement in physical function with a rehabilitation intervention. Biomarkers may help clinicians predict the benefits of this treatment. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others; REHAB-HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02196038).

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
10.1%
4
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
5
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.7%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
8
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
9
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
10
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
11
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
14
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
16
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
18
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
19
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
20
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
21
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
22
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
23
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
24
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
27
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
28
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
29
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%