Back

Circulating Biomarkers as Predictors of Improvement in Physical Function in Hospitalized Older Adults with Geriatric Syndromes: Findings from the REHAB-HF Trial

Damluji, A.; Bruce, S. A.; Reeves, G.; Pastva, A. M.; Bertoni, A. G.; Mentz, R. J.; Whellan, D.; Kitzman, D.; deFilippi, C. R.

2024-09-15 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.09.13.24313662
Show abstract

IntroductionCirculating biomarkers play an important role in patients with heart failure (HF) for risk stratification and mechanistic insights. We aimed to examine if a diverse set of biomarkers in the REHAB-HF trial would predict improvement in physical function following a 12-week tailored physical therapy rehabilitation intervention compared to attention control. MethodsThe study population consisted of participants [&ge;]60 years of age who were hospitalized with acute HF and randomized to a subsequent multidomain outpatient physical rehabilitation intervention vs. attention control with outcomes of 12-week functional change including the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and six-minute walk distance (6MWD). Blood was collected prior to randomization and at 12-weeks for cardiac, renal, and inflammatory biomarkers. Linear trends across progressively higher biomarker values versus improvement in functional outcomes based on treatment assignment were evaluated. Classification and regression trees (CART) were created to estimate optimal biomarker levels associated with differential improvement in the two functional outcomes. ResultsA total of 242 of 349 participants (69%) had baseline biomarkers measured. In an adjusted regression model, higher baseline cardiac troponin (cTn) I and T were associated with greater gains in SPPB and 6MWD respectively with the rehabilitation intervention (P=0.04 and 0.03 for interaction) versus attention control. In the CART analysis of the physical rehabilitation and attention control participants, those with baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) [&ge;]9.9 mg/L and hs-cTnT [&ge;]36 ng/L receiving the rehabilitation intervention had a 129 m (95% CI 78-180m) greater 12-week 6MWD increase vs attention control. In contrast, for participants with CRP<9.9 mg/L there was no significant incremental 6MWD difference (30m, 95% CI -0.5m, 60.2m). For SPPB, a CRP [&ge;]9.9 mg/L and creatinine [&ge;]1.4 mg/dL optimally identified a differential improvement with the rehabilitation intervention versus attention control. The biomarkers (except for creatinine) decreased by 12 weeks post hospitalization but with no differences based on treatment assignment. ConclusionHigher baseline levels of biomarkers of inflammation, cardiac injury, and renal dysfunction identified older adults after a HF hospitalization with the greatest differential improvement in physical function with a rehabilitation intervention. Biomarkers may help clinicians predict the benefits of this treatment. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others; REHAB-HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02196038).

Matching journals

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 92 published papers
Top 0.4%
23× avg
2
Circulation: Heart Failure
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 11 published papers
#1
180× avg
3
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 64%
6.1%
4
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 33 published papers
Top 2%
14× avg
5
The American Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 1%
30× avg
6
Circulation
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 37 published papers
Top 2%
15× avg
7
Open Heart
BMJ · based on 18 published papers
Top 1%
25× avg
8
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 40%
4.7%
9
European Heart Journal
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 14 published papers
Top 2%
18× avg
10
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.3%
42× avg
11
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 30 published papers
Top 2%
12× avg
12
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.5%
40× avg
13
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 15 published papers
Top 2%
13× avg
14
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
20× avg
15
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 2%
16× avg
16
International Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 2%
13× avg
17
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 43%
1.4%
18
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 13%
2.1× avg
19
Atherosclerosis
Elsevier BV · based on 16 published papers
Top 3%
6.0× avg
20
Heart
BMJ · based on 10 published papers
Top 3%
8.1× avg
21
Hypertension
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 20 published papers
Top 4%
4.4× avg