Cohort profile: The Camden Study - a pregnancy cohort study of pregnancy complications and birth outcomes in Camden, New Jersey, USA
Shiau, S.; Chen, X.; April-Sanders, A.; Francis, E. C.; Rawal, S.; Hansel, M.; Adeyemi, K.; Rivera-Nunez, Z.; Barrett, E. S.
Show abstract
BackgroundPregnancy is a unique stage of the life course characterized by trade-offs between the nutritional, immune, and metabolic needs of the mother and fetus. The Camden Study was originally initiated to examine nutritional status, growth, and birth outcomes in adolescent pregnancies and expanded to study dietary and molecular predictors of pregnancy complications and birth outcomes in young women. MethodsFrom 1985-2006, 4765 pregnant participants aged 12 years and older were recruited from Camden, NJ, one of the poorest cities in the U.S. The cohort reflects a population under-represented in perinatal cohort studies (45% Hispanic, 38% non-Hispanic Black, 17% White participants; 98% using Medicaid in pregnancy). Study visits, including questionnaires, dietary assessments, and biospecimen collection, occurred in early and late pregnancy as well as at delivery. Medical records were abstracted, and a subset of mothers and infants participated in a six-week postpartum visit. ResultsOver the last five decades, the Camden Study has provided data toward the publication of numerous peer-reviewed papers. Results show that adolescent linear growth in pregnancy is associated with smaller birth size, possibly due to impaired hemodynamics. In the context of preterm birth and other perinatal outcomes, analyses of nutritional data have demonstrated the importance of micronutrients (e.g., folate, iron, zinc), as well as glucose/insulin dynamics and prenatal supplement use. More recent analyses have begun to unpack the biochemical pathways in pregnancy that may be shaped by race as an indicator for systemic racism. ConclusionsThe Camden Study data and biorepositories are well-positioned to support future research aimed at better understanding perinatal health in under-represented women and infants. Linkages to subsequent health and administrative records and the potential for recontacting participants over 18-39 years after initial participation may provide key insights into the trajectories of maternal and child health across the life course.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Folic acid-containing supplement use among females aged 15-55 in the Canadian Community Health Survey 2015-2018 94%
- Associations Between Prenatal Vitamin D and Placental Gene Expression 94%
- Unique Metabolic Profiles in South Asian Women Characterizes Gestational Diabetes in Low and High-Risk Women 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early postpartum HbA1c after hyperglycemia first detected in pregnancy - imperfect but not without value 94%
- How do perceptions of Covid-19 risk impact pregnancy-related health decisions? A convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol 94%
- Growth differentiation factor 15 increases in both cerebrospinal fluid and serum during pregnancy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of antenatal balanced plate nutrition education for pregnant women on birth weight: a cluster randomised controlled trial in rural Bangladesh 92%
- Vitamin D3 Supplementation at 5000 IU Daily for the Prevention of Influenza-Like Illness in Healthcare Workers: A Randomized Clinical Trial 91%
- Temporal association of reduced serum vitamin D with COVID-19 infection: A single-institution case-control and historical cohort study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cardiovascular health in early pregnancy and circulating placental biomarkers 97%
- Changes in maternal blood and placental lipidomic profile in obesity and gestational diabetes: Evidence for sexual dimorphism 93%
- Isolated fetal neural tube defects associate with increased risk of placental pathology: evidence from the Collaborative Perinatal Project 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.