Back

Contraceptive Outcomes of the Natural Cycles Birth Control App: A Study of Canadian Women

Benhar, E.; van Lamsweerde, A.; Berglund Scherwitzl, E.; Krauss, K.; Scherwitzl, R.

2024-09-16 obstetrics and gynecology
10.1101/2024.09.13.24313618 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the key demographics and evaluate the real-world contraceptive failure and continuation rates of the Natural Cycles app in a cohort of women from Canada. MethodsThis was a real-world, prospective cohort study. Demographics were assessed via in-app questionnaires. Contraceptive failure rates in typical and perfect use were calculated using the 13-cycle cumulative pregnancy probability (Kaplan-Meier survival analysis) and the one-year Pearl Index (PI). One-year continuation rates were estimated through survival analysis. ResultsThe study included 8 798 women who contributed an average of 9.2 months of data, amounting to a total of 7 063 woman-years of exposure. The average user was 27.3 years old, had a body mass index of 24.6, and reported being in a stable relationship. With typical use, the app demonstrated a 13-cycle cumulative pregnancy probability of 4.8 [95% CI: 4.3, 5.4] and a Pearl Index of 4.3 [95% CI: 3.9, 4.8]. Under perfect use, the contraceptive failure rate was 2.3 [95% CI: 0.7, 3.9] for life table analysis and 1.7 [95% CI: 0.5, 2.8] for the 1-year PI. The contraceptive methods continuation rate after one year was 62.4%. ConclusionsThe data presented in this study offer valuable insights into the cohort of women using the Natural Cycles app in Canada and provide country-specific effectiveness estimates. The apps contraceptive effectiveness aligns with previously published data on Natural Cycles.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.2%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 16%
11.9%
3
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.8%
5
JAMIA Open
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
6
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
7
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
8
Human Reproduction
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
9
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
10
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.4%
12
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
13
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
14
JMIR Research Protocols
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
16
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
International Journal of Medical Informatics
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Journal of the International AIDS Society
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
20
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Healthcare
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
BMJ Open Quality
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%