Multi-center improvement in screening for dystonia in young people with cerebral palsy
Aravamuthan, B. R.; Lott, E.; Pehlivan, E.; Chintalapati, K.; Grenard, D.; Roge, D.; Gelineau-Morel, R.; Kyle, D.; Becu, C.; Kruer, M. C.; Katus, L.; Gross, P.; Bailes, A. F.; Cerebral Palsy Research Network,
Show abstract
Background and ObjectivesDystonia is a common, debilitating, and often treatment refractory motor symptom of cerebral palsy (CP), affecting 70-80% of this population based on research assessments. However, routine clinical evaluation for dystonia in CP has failed to match these expected numbers. Addressing this diagnostic gap is a medical imperative because the presence of dystonia rules in or out certain treatments for motor symptoms in CP. Therefore, our objective was to optimize rates of clinical dystonia screening to improve rates of clinical dystonia diagnosis. MethodsUsing the quality improvement (QI) infrastructure of the Cerebral Palsy Research Network (CPRN), we developed and implemented interventions to increase the documentation percentage of five features of dystonia in young people with CP, aged 3-21 years old. This QI initiative was implemented by seven physiatry and pediatric movement disorders physicians at four tertiary-care pediatric hospitals between 10/10/21 and 7/1/23. We collected visit data cross-sectionally across all participating sites every 2 weeks and tracked our progress using control charts. ResultsWe assessed 847 unique visits, mostly for established patients (719/847, 85%) who were 9.2 years old on average (95% CI 8.8-9.5). By 4/10/22, the mean percentage of dystonia screening elements documented across all sites rose from 39% to 90% and the mean percentage of visits explicitly documenting the presence or absence of dystonia rose from 65% to 94%. By 10/23/22, the percentage of visits diagnosing dystonia rose from 57% to 74%. These increases were all sustained through the end of the study period in 7/1/23. DiscussionUsing a rigorous QI-driven process across four member sites of a North American learning health network (CPRN), we demonstrated that we could increase screening for dystonia and that this was associated with increased clinical dystonia diagnosis, matching expected research-based rates. We propose that similar screening should take place across all sites caring for people with CP.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-reported access to specialty clinics and receipt of health surveillance among U.S. patients with neurofibromatosis 1: A national survey 93%
- Utilization of CoRDS Registry to Monitor Quality of Life in Patients with VCP Multisystem Proteinopathy 90%
- The COVID-19 pandemic impact on continuity of care provision on rare brain diseases and on Ataxia, Dystonia and PKU. A scoping review protocol 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Causal factors affecting gross motor function in children diagnosed with cerebral palsy 92%
- Postural control telerehabilitation with a low-cost virtual reality protocol for children with cerebral palsy: Protocol for a clinical trial 91%
- How can instructions and feedback with external focus be shaped to enhance motor learning in children? A systematic review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Measuring Quality-of-Care in Treatment of Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Novel Application of Natural Language Processing 92%
- Large Language Models Facilitate the Generation of Electronic Health Record Phenotyping Algorithms 89%
- Observer: Creation of a Novel Multimodal Dataset for Outpatient Care Research 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.