Back

Multi-center improvement in screening for dystonia in young people with cerebral palsy

Aravamuthan, B. R.; Lott, E.; Pehlivan, E.; Chintalapati, K.; Grenard, D.; Roge, D.; Gelineau-Morel, R.; Kyle, D.; Becu, C.; Kruer, M. C.; Katus, L.; Gross, P.; Bailes, A. F.; Cerebral Palsy Research Network,

2024-09-14 neurology
10.1101/2024.09.13.24313431 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and ObjectivesDystonia is a common, debilitating, and often treatment refractory motor symptom of cerebral palsy (CP), affecting 70-80% of this population based on research assessments. However, routine clinical evaluation for dystonia in CP has failed to match these expected numbers. Addressing this diagnostic gap is a medical imperative because the presence of dystonia rules in or out certain treatments for motor symptoms in CP. Therefore, our objective was to optimize rates of clinical dystonia screening to improve rates of clinical dystonia diagnosis. MethodsUsing the quality improvement (QI) infrastructure of the Cerebral Palsy Research Network (CPRN), we developed and implemented interventions to increase the documentation percentage of five features of dystonia in young people with CP, aged 3-21 years old. This QI initiative was implemented by seven physiatry and pediatric movement disorders physicians at four tertiary-care pediatric hospitals between 10/10/21 and 7/1/23. We collected visit data cross-sectionally across all participating sites every 2 weeks and tracked our progress using control charts. ResultsWe assessed 847 unique visits, mostly for established patients (719/847, 85%) who were 9.2 years old on average (95% CI 8.8-9.5). By 4/10/22, the mean percentage of dystonia screening elements documented across all sites rose from 39% to 90% and the mean percentage of visits explicitly documenting the presence or absence of dystonia rose from 65% to 94%. By 10/23/22, the percentage of visits diagnosing dystonia rose from 57% to 74%. These increases were all sustained through the end of the study period in 7/1/23. DiscussionUsing a rigorous QI-driven process across four member sites of a North American learning health network (CPRN), we demonstrated that we could increase screening for dystonia and that this was associated with increased clinical dystonia diagnosis, matching expected research-based rates. We propose that similar screening should take place across all sites caring for people with CP.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.7%
3
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
4
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
6
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
7
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.2%
9
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Movement Disorders
62 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.2%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Swiss Medical Weekly
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
16
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
17
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
18
Journal of Anatomy
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
19
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
24
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
28
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
29
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
30
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%