Sensitive dissection of a genomic regulatory landscape using bulk and targeted single-cell activation
Vucicevic, D.; Hsu, C.-W.; Lopez Zepeda, L. S.; Burkert, M.; Hirsekorn, A.; Bilic, I.; Kastelic, N.; Landthaler, M.; Lacadie, S. A.; Ohler, U.
Show abstract
Transcriptional enhancers are non-coding DNA elements that regulate gene transcription in a temporal and tissue-specific manner. Despite advances in computational and experimental methods, identifying enhancers and their target genes essential for specific biological processes remains challenging. Determining target genes for enhancers is also complex and often relies on indirect, low-resolution, and/or assumptive methodologies. To identify and functionally perturb enhancers at their endogenous sites without altering their sequence, we performed a pooled tiling CRISPR activation (CRISPRa) screen surrounding PHOX2B, a master regulator of neuronal cell fate and a key player in neuroblastoma development. This screen allowed the de novo identification of CRISPRa responsive elements (CaREs) that alter cellular growth within the 2 Mb genomic region. To determine CaRE target genes, we developed TESLA-seq (TargEted SingLe cell Activation), which combines CRISPRa screening with targeted single-cell RNA-sequencing and enables the parallel readout of the effect of hundreds of enhancers on all genes in the locus. While most TESLA-revealed CaRE-gene relationships involved neuroblastoma-related regulatory elements already active in the system, we found many CaREs and target connections normally active only in other tissue types or with no previous evidence and induced out of context by CRISPRa. This highlights the power of TESLA-seq to reveal gene regulatory networks, including edges active outside of a given experimental system. HighlightsO_LISystematically perturbed regulatory landscape in a 2 Mb genomic region surrounding PHOX2B to identify hundreds of CRISPRa-responsive elements that affect cellular growth C_LIO_LIDeveloped TESLA-seq as a principled molecular approach to find gene targets of dozens of candidate regulatory elements C_LIO_LIValidated interactions between identified regulatory elements and target genes and characterized their genomic features C_LIO_LIIntegrated a compendium of epigenomic datasets to identify regulatory relationships induced out of context or with no previous evidence C_LI
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A genome-wide nucleosome-resolution map of promoter-centered interactions in human cells corroborates the enhancer-promoter looping model 97%
- Maximizing CRISPRi efficacy and accessibility with dual-sgRNA libraries and optimal effectors 96%
- Systematic analysis of naturally occurring insertions and deletions that alter transcription factor spacing identifies tolerant and sensitive transcription factor pairs 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cohesin promotes stochastic domain intermingling to ensure proper regulation of boundary-proximal genes 95%
- Conservation of Regulatory Elements with Highly Diverged Sequences Across Large Evolutionary Distances 95%
- In vivo dissection of a clustered-CTCF domain boundary reveals developmental principles of regulatory insulation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dissecting the regulatory activity and sequence content of loci with exceptional numbers of transcription factor associations 96%
- Enhancers display constrained sequence flexibility and context-specific modulation of motif function 96%
- Identifying transcription factor-bound gene activators and silencers in the chromatin accessible human genome using ATAC-STARR-seq 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single nucleus multi-omics links human cortical cell regulatory genome diversity to disease risk variants 96%
- Evaluating Methods for the Prediction of Cell Type-Specific Enhancers in the Mammalian Cortex 95%
- Activation of the imprinted Prader-Willi Syndrome locus by CRISPR-based epigenome editing 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.