Developing and validating modular surveys for vector-borne diseases: a study protocol
Finucane, S.; Renault, A.; Hayden, M.; Ernst, K.; Yeo, S.
Show abstract
Vector-borne diseases are an increasing threat to human health and well-being in the United States. Understanding public perception and practices taken to reduce vector abundance and vector-human contact can guide effective interventions that can mitigate health risks. Nevertheless, vector-borne disease surveys, which are widely used in the field to understand public perception and practices, are often inconsistent in terms of structure and implementation. This protocol is designed to provide guidance for public health professionals and researchers in the development of future KAP studies by ensuring uniformity in design and structure. This manuscript describes a rigorous three-phase protocol for the development of standardized vector-borne disease survey modules that can be used throughout the United States to generate data that are comparable across diverse regions. During phase one, a workshop with subject matter experts and a comprehensive literature review will be conducted to identify survey domains and generate items of interest. Survey items will also be mapped based on two theoretical frameworks, the Health Belief Model and the Risks, Attitudes, Norms, Abilities and Self-Regulation framework, to help gauge individual perceptions of risk severity and self-efficacy. During phase two, a group of expert judges will evaluate survey items based on content relevance, representativeness, and technical quality. During the final phase, cognitive interviews and surveys with target audience groups will be conducted to ensure the face validity of the modules. Participants will be drawn from a diverse range of educational and geographic locations, and computer-assisted personal interviewing will be implemented. The surveys developed through this protocol will be available to researchers aiming to gain deeper insights into the publics knowledge, attitudes, and practices concerning vector-borne diseases, facilitating the collection of more comparable data across various regions in the United States.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of a Digital Entomological Surveillance Planning Tool for Malaria Vector Control: Three Country Mixed Methods Pilot Study 96%
- Community health worker knowledge, attitudes and practices towards COVID-19: learnings from an online cross-sectional survey using a digital health platform, UpSCALE, in Mozambique 96%
- Perceptions and compliance with COVID-19 preventive measures in Southern and Central regions of Mozambique: a quantitative in-person household survey in the districts of Manhiça and Quelimane 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of a framework to improve neglected tropical diseases surveillance and response at the sub-national level in Kenya 96%
- Assessing the knowledge, attitudes, practices, and perspectives of stakeholders of the deworming program in rural Rwanda 96%
- Arbovirus risk perception as a predictor of mosquito-bite preventive behaviors in Ponce, Puerto Rico 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A cross-sectional study of COVID-19 knowledge, beliefs and prevention behaviors among adults in Senegal 95%
- COVID-19 Vaccine hesitancy in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A mixed-methods study 94%
- Protocol for a Comprehensive Analysis of Hepatitis C Risk Factors among the Rohingya Population in Camp Settings in Cox’s Bazar: A Mixed-Method Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability and associated factors of indoor residual spraying for Malaria control by households in Luangwa district of Zambia: A multilevel analysis 95%
- Health care workers’ self-perceived infection risk and COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a mixed methods study 95%
- The role of Rwanda Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program graduates and residents in response to the first Marburg Virus Disease outbreak in Rwanda 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the value and knowledge gains from an online tick identification and tick-borne disease management course for the Southeastern United States 95%
- Understanding Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices on Ebola Virus Disease: A Multi-Site Mixed Methods Survey on Preparedness in Rwanda 95%
- Mpox knowledge and perception in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.