Back

Ancient DNA Clarifies the Identity and Geographic Origin of the holotype of the genus Ctenomys

Maestri, R.; Goncalves, G. L.; Nicolas-Colin, V.; Bryjova, A.; Fornel, R.; Coissac, E.; Taberlet, P.; Moreira, G. R.; Ochotorena de Freitas, T. R.

2024-09-10 zoology
10.1101/2024.09.10.612281 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Ctenomys Blainville 1826 ranks among the top ten most diverse mammal genera in terms of species richness. However, the taxonomic history of Ctenomys brasiliensis Blainville,1826, the corresponding type species, has long been obscured by a dearth of information regarding the collection data of the type material, compounded by an elusive geographic origin. Here, employing ancient DNA methodology, we sequenced the complete mitogenome of the remaining type specimen and conducted an extensive historical investigation to correlate originally described locality names with present-day locales in South America. Our analysis unequivocally confirms that the type specimen corresponds to the species currently designated as Ctenomys minutus Nehring, 1887. This resolution lays to rest a century-old debate surrounding the provenance of the type specimen, rejecting prior hypotheses that placed its collection site in southeastern Brazil or Uruguay. Instead, our evidence suggests it was likely obtained from a third location in southernmost Brazil. Previous analyses overlooked this new location due to confusion surrounding geographic nomenclature and labeling errors, issues rectified by our combined mitogenomic and historical approach. Furthermore, quantitative morphological analyses boost our findings, demonstrating a closer affinity between C. brasiliensis and C. minutus within the same species group. Accordingly, we validate C. brasiliensis and propose C. minutus as its junior synonym. Our study underscores the importance of robust DNA analyses in confirming the identity and geographic origins of type specimens, especially for Ctenomys species with similar phenotypes, and specimens collected centuries ago.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.9%
2
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.7%
4
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Systematic Entomology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
6
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Zootaxa
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.7%
9
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
The Anatomical Record
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
Primates
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.3%
14
Journal of Anatomy
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
15
Parasites & Vectors
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
16
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
17
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.9%
18
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
20
Microscopy and Microanalysis
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
21
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
22
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
23
Animal Conservation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%