Adverse Events During a 12-month Multi-Site and Dose-Response Aerobic Exercise Intervention
Vidoni, E.; Grove, G.; Szabo-Reed, A.; Key, M. N.; Huang, H.; Burns, J. M.; Hillman, C. H.; Jakicic, J.; Kang, C.; Kramer, A. F.; McAuley, E.; Wan, L.; Hawes, T.; White, S. S.; Erickson, K. I.
Show abstract
PurposeThis study aimed to assess the incidence of adverse events (AE) in older adults participating in a year-long exercise intervention, investigating potential dose-response relationships between exercise intensity and AE frequency, and identifying demographic factors associated with AE risk. MethodsA total of 648 older adults were randomized into one of three exercise groups: low-intensity stretching and toning (S&T), 150 minutes of aerobic exercise per week (150Ex), or 225 minutes of aerobic exercise per week (225Ex). Adverse events were tracked during the intervention, with event rates calculated based on participant adherence and time in the study. Generalized linear models were employed to compare AE incidence across groups. Post hoc comparisons were used to calculate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for AE between groups, adjusting for multiple comparisons. ResultsOverall, 306 AE were reported, with 44% related to the intervention. No significant dose-response relationship was observed for all-cause AE between groups. However, intervention-related AE were more frequent in the aerobic exercise groups. Participants in the 150Ex group had a 77% higher rate of intervention-related AE compared to the S&T group, and the 225Ex group had an 88% higher rate. Higher adherence was associated with fewer all-cause AE, and greater comorbid burden was associated with more AE. ConclusionsWhile aerobic exercise increased the risk of intervention-related AE, the overall risk remained low. Higher adherence to the exercise regimen was associated with fewer AE. These findings suggest aerobic exercise is generally safe in older adults, with the benefits outweighing the risks.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Heavy Resistance Exercise Training in Older Men: A Responder and Inter-individual Variability Analysis 95%
- Supervised and self-directed technology-based dual-task exercise training programme for older adults at risk of falling – Protocol for a feasibility study 94%
- Multimodal Prehabilitation in People Awaiting Acute Inpatient Cardiac Surgery: Study Protocol for a Pilot Feasibility Trial (PreP-ACe) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of 12 weeks of Multi-nutrient supplementation on the Immune and Musculoskeletal systems of Older Adults in Aged-Care (The Pomerium Study): Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial 95%
- Anatomy of a Failure: Can a Cognitive-Bias Modification Intervention Improve Physical Activity in Patients Following a Cardiac Rehabilitation Programme? 93%
- Correlates of and changes in aerobic physical activity and strength training before and after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic in the UK – findings from the HEBECO study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Practical recommendations for staying physically active during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic literature review 92%
- Changes in health behaviors, mental and physical health among older adults under severe lockdown restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain 92%
- The effect of breaking up sedentary time with calisthenics on neuromuscular function: a preliminary study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Pilot Study on the Effects of Medically Supervised, Water-Only Fasting and Refeeding on Cardiometabolic Risk 92%
- Vitamin D3 Supplementation at 5000 IU Daily for the Prevention of Influenza-Like Illness in Healthcare Workers: A Randomized Clinical Trial 92%
- Shatavari Supplementation in Postmenopausal Women Improves Handgrip Strength and Increases Vastus Lateralis Myosin Regulatory Light Chain Phosphorylation But Does Not Alter Markers of Bone Turnover: A Randomised Controlled Trial 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.