Back

Probing other's Presence: Probabilistic Inference Across Brain Scales Reveals Enhanced Excitatory Synaptic Efficacy

Esmaeili, A.; Demolliens, M.; Viersen, M.; Ziaeemehr, A.; Isbaine, F.; Huguet, P.; Zaal, F.; Jirsa, V.; Boussaoud, D.; Hashemi, M.

2024-09-13 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.09.09.612006 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The presence of conspecifics is a fundamental and arguably invariant prerequisite of social cognition across numerous animal species. While the influence of social presence on behavior has been among the focal points of investigation in social psychology for over a century, its underlying neural mechanisms remain largely unexplored. Here, we attempt to bridge this gap by investigating how the presence of conspecifics changes synaptic efficacy from measurements across spatiotemporal brain scales, and how such changes could lead to modulations of task performance in monkeys and humans. In monkeys performing an association learning task, social presence increased excitatory synaptic efficacy in attention-oriented regions dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex. In humans performing a visuomotor task, the presence of conspecifics facilitated performance in one of the subject groups, and this facilitation was linked to enhanced excitatory synaptic efficacy within the dorsal and ventral attention networks. We propose that presence-induced improvements in task performance arise from attentional modulation mediated by changes in excitatory synaptic efficacy across three spatiotemporal brain scales, namely, micro-scale (single neurons), meso-scale (cortical columns) and macro-scale (whole-brain). Our findings from Bayesian learning converge to establish a novel, multi-scale framework for understanding the neural underpinnings of social presence effects. This probabilistic framework offers a fresh perspective on social presence research, and lays the groundwork for future investigations into the complex interplay between social presence, neural dynamics, and behavior.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.