Climatic-environmental influences on hominin brain size over the last 5 million years
Nicholson, S. L.; Puschel, T.; Baker, J.; Venditti, C.
Show abstract
A large brain relative to body mass is considered a distinguishing hominin trait. It has frequently been related to a suite of social, behavioral, technological, and other cognitive adaptations that differentiate humans from other species. The processes underlying large brain size evolution have therefore been a subject of rigorous scientific debate. Many hypotheses have been proposed to explain how climate and environment drive the selection of larger brain sizes, but monotonic influences of climate-environmental selective pressures are often assumed and rarely have between- and within-species effects been considered. Here, we apply Bayesian phylogenetic comparative techniques to the hominin fossil record to test the effect of climatic and environmental pressures (C-E) on brain size evolution, whilst simultaneously accounting for body mass and chronological age. We find that colder and more variable temperatures have a positive within-species effect on brain size evolution, likely related to biological adaptations to mitigate against hypothermia. However, in Homo, the strength of this effect diminishes over time suggesting that in later species (Homo sapiens and Homo neanderthalensis) brain sizes were less affected by C-E conditions.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evolutionary and phylogenetic insights from a nuclear genome sequence of the extinct, giant subfossil koala lemur Megaladapis edwardsi 96%
- The history and evolution of the Denisovan-EPAS1 haplotype in Tibetans 94%
- The genetic structure and adaptation of Andean highlanders and Amazonian dwellers is influenced by the interplay between geography and culture 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.