Back

Integrating co-design into formative research for a SBCC entry-point platform for nutrition-sensitive social protection programs in low -and middle-income country settings.

Turk, T.; Paul, R.; Safdar, N. F.; Alam, S. M.; Choudhury, S. R.; Shafique, K.; Ahmer, Z.; Wenndt, A. J.; Babar, H. K.; Sadaf, T.; Bipul, M.

2024-09-10 nutrition
10.1101/2024.09.08.24313037 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAchieving adequate nutrition for vulnerable populations is an objective of the Sustainable Development Goals. Nutrition-sensitive social protection programs, including those that promote nutrition through Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC), have the potential to reduce malnutrition and provide social supports to those most in need. Country-level needs assessments can clarify key issues. When supported by co-design approaches, program formative research may provide more culturally contextualised SBCC for the improved delivery of nutrition social protection to vulnerable groups. This formative study from Pakistan and Bangladesh, integrated co-design to more fully explore program beneficiary knowledge, attitudes and perceptions toward nutrition social protection to inform the design of SBCC key messages and an entry-point platform to ensure effective message dissemination. MethodsQualitative formative research was conducted to support findings from a systematic review. Thirty semi-structured interviews with program stakeholders and 12 focus group discussions (134 participants) were conducted with program beneficiaries in Bangladesh and Pakistan. Co-design sessions supplemented the needs assessment protocol. A COREQ checklist ensured best practice approaches in research design, analysis and reporting. NVIVO 2023 qualitative software supported the thematic analysis. ResultsFour organising themes were identified: 1. Barriers to Program Engagement, 2. Opportunities for Program Improvement, 3. Knowledge Attitudes and Practices, and 4. Target Groups, Messaging and SBCC Entry-Points, with 21 sub-themes emerging under the four organising themes. Main barriers related to resource constraints and maladministration of SPPs while opportunities identified greater integration of cash transfers with nutritious food provision, increased engagement with key influencers in vulnerable communities, and identification of culturally nuanced messages with dissemination through preferred channels. Integrating co-design sessions provided greater ownership, participation and engagement by program beneficiaries and more pragmatic SBCC solutions to challenges identified. ConclusionThe needs assessments and integrated co-design sessions highlighted the benefits of close consultation with program beneficiaries in the design of culturally appropriate SBCC interventions to support nutrition-sensitive social protection programs. A SBCC entry-point platform was developed from participant recommendations to provide options for programmers on message designs, advocacy approaches and dissemination channels with the approaches applicable for a number of low -and middle-income countries where malnutrition is a major challenge.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.4%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
9.1%
4
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.8%
8
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
9
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
10
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
11
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
12
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
14
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
15
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
16
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
18
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
20
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%