Back

High-efficiency discovery and structure-activity-relationship analysis of non-substrate-based covalent inhibitors of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase

Ai, Y.; Xu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Liu, S.

2024-09-13 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2024.09.07.611751 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Targeted covalent inhibitors (TCIs) form covalent bonds with targets following initial non-covalent binding. The advantages of TCIs have driven a resurgence in rational TCI design over the past decade, resulting in the approval of several blockbuster covalent drugs. To support TCI discovery, various computational methods have been developed. However, accurately predicting TCI reactivity remains challenging due to interference between non-covalent scaffolds and reactive warheads, leading to inefficiencies in computational screening and high experimental costs. In this study, we enhanced the SCARdock protocol, a validated computational screening tool developed by our lab, by incorporating quantum chemistry-based warhead reactivity calculations. By integrating these calculations with non-covalent docking scores, docking ranks, and bonding-atom distances, non-covalent and covalent inhibitors of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase (AdoMetDC) were correctly classified. Using the optimized SCARdock, we successfully identified twelve new AdoMetDC covalent inhibitors from 17 compounds, achieving a 70.6% hit rate. From these novel inhibitors, we analyzed the contributions of non-covalent interactions and covalent bonding, enabling a structure-activity relationship (SAR) analysis for AdoMetDC covalent inhibitors, which was previously unexplored with substrate-based inhibitors. Overall, this work presents an efficient computational protocol for TCI discovery and offers new insights into AdoMetDC inhibitor design. We anticipate that this approach will stimulate TCI development by improving computational screening efficiency and reducing experimental costs.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.7%
2
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
77 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.8%
3
ChemMedChem
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
4
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.8%
5
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
93 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
6
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
9
Chemical Science
73 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.2%
11
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
12
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.2%
13
ACS Central Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
14
ACS Infectious Diseases
82 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
15
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
16
Journal of Natural Products
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
17
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
Chemical Research in Toxicology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
20
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.0%
22
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.0%
23
Frontiers in Chemistry
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
27
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
28
Molecules
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.6%
30
Pharmaceuticals
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%