Back

Exploring yield stability and the fitness landscape of maize landrace root phenotypes in silico

Lopez-Valdivia, I.; Rangarajan, H.; Vallebueno-Estrada, M.; Lynch, J.

2024-09-12 plant biology
10.1101/2024.09.07.609951 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Integrated root phenotypes contribute to environmental adaptation and yield stability. We used the functional-structural plant/soil model OpenSimRoot_v2 to reconstruct the root phenotypes and environments of eight maize landraces to understand the phenotypic and environmental factors associated with broad adaptation. We found that accessions from low phosphorus regions have root phenotypes with shallow growth angles and greater nodal root numbers, allowing them to adapt to their native environments by improved topsoil foraging. We used machine learning algorithms to detect the most important phenotypes responsible for adaptation to multiple environments. The most important phene states responsible for stability across environments are large cortical cell size and reduced diameter of roots in nodes 5 and 6. When we dissected the components of root diameter, we observed that large cortical cell size improved growth by 28%, 23 % and 114%, while reduced cortical cell file number alone improved shoot growth by 137%, 66% and 216%, under drought, nitrogen and phosphorus stress, respectively. Functional-structural analysis of 96 maize landraces from the Americas, previously phenotyped in mesocosms in the greenhouse, suggested that parsimonious anatomical phenotypes, which reduce the metabolic cost of soil exploration, are the main phenotypes associated with adaptation to multiple environments, while root architectural traits were related to adaptation to specific environments. Our results indicate that integrated phenotypes with root anatomical phenes that reduce the metabolic cost of soil exploration will increase tolerance to stress across multiple environments and therefore improve yield stability, regardless of their root architecture.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.6%
2
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.3%
3
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.7%
4
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
6
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
7
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.1%
9
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 31%
2.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.9%
12
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.2%
15
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
16
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
17
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.7%
19
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
20
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
23
Molecular Plant
36 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%