Back

The Cardioprotective Role of Neutrophil-Specific STING in Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury

Brockman, M. L.; Scruggs, T. A.; Wang, L.; Kabboul, G.; Calvert, J. W.; Levit, R. D.

2024-09-11 immunology
10.1101/2024.09.06.611551 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundNeutrophils are the most rapid and abundant immune cells to infiltrate the myocardium following myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury (MI/R). Neutrophil heterogeneity has not been well characterized in MI/R, and studies have shown conflicting results regarding the impact of neutrophil depletion on cardiac injury. We thus aim to study the impact of neutrophils with enriched type I interferon signature and the role of STING (stimulator of interferon genes) signaling in neutrophils on cardiac reperfusion injury. MethodsWe utilized single-cell RNA sequencing to study neutrophil heterogeneity in response to MI/R. We generated a neutrophil-specific STING knockout mouse to assess the role of neutrophil STING in a model of MI/R. We examined cardiac function following injury via echocardiography and assessed the immune cell trajectory following injury utilizing flow cytometry. ResultsWe identified a population of neutrophils with enriched type I interferon signaling and response to type I interferon following MI/R. We found that genetic deletion of neutrophil-specific STING led to worsened cardiac function following MI/R. Further investigation of the immune response by flow cytometry revealed decreased neutrophil infiltration into the myocardium and a shift in macrophage polarization. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that neutrophil-specific STING is cardioprotective in MI/R, partly due to its effects on downstream immune cells. These results demonstrate that early alterations or therapeutic interventions can influence key events in the resolution of inflammation following MI/R.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.0%
2
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
15.2%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
5
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
6
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
7
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
9
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
10
Circulation Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
11
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
12
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
13
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
14
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
15
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
16
FASEB BioAdvances
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
25
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
26
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%