Phenotypic presentation of family members of ATTRv probands and subsequent disease penetrance
Fazzini, L.; Castrichini, M.; Li, Y.; de Melo, J. F.; Figueiral, M.; Cao, J. J.; Klee, E.; Cadeddu Dessalvi, C.; Grogan, M.; Dispenzieri, A.; Pereira, N. L.
Show abstract
BACKGROUNDHereditary transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTRv-CM) is being increasingly diagnosed due to enhanced awareness and availability of newer therapeutics. Multiple TTR variants have been described worldwide, but with uncertain disease penetrance. The characteristics and outcomes of "previously undiagnosed" pathogenic-likely pathogenic (P/LP) TTR variant (genotype or G+; cardiac phenotype or P-) carriers are unknown which has important prognostic and therapeutic implications, especially for affected family members. This descriptive study aimed to delineate phenotype and cardiac penetrance in "previously undiagnosed" G+P-family members of ATTRv probands. METHODSDemographic, electrocardiographic (ECG), genetic, and imaging (echocardiography, cardiac technetium-99m pyrophosphate (PYP) and magnetic resonance imaging) data were analyzed. The prediction effect of selected baseline characteristics for ATTRv-CM development was evaluated. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods were used to describe risk and predictors of ATTRv-CM development in family members. RESULTSThere were 85 G+P-family members identified. Mean age was 48.5{+/-}11.7 years, 39% were male, 18% had a diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy, 15% with a history of carpal tunnel syndrome, and 4% had atrioventricular block at baseline. Of these, 55 patients had follow-up imaging studies. After a median 6.8-year follow-up, 22% developed ATTR-CM with a 10-year estimated risk of 29.5% (95% CI 7.9-46.0). Cardiac penetrance increased with increasing family members age. Probands diagnosis age (p=0.0096) and artificial intelligence (AI)-ECG prediction (p=0.0091) were promising baseline predictors of time to ATTRv-CM development. CONCLUSIONIn previously undiagnosed G+P-ATTRv family members, the incidence of subsequent CM is high. Predictors for CM development such as probands diagnosis age and AI-determined ECG probability of ATTR-CM require further investigation.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- ALPK3 heterozygous truncating variants cause late-onset hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with frequent apical involvement and apical aneurysm 97%
- Prevalence and disease expression of pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants associated with inherited cardiomyopathies in the general population 96%
- Variant location is a novel risk factor for individuals with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy due to a desmoplakin (DSP) truncating variant 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical presentation, disease course and outcome of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with and without pre-existing cardiac disease – a cohort study across sixteen countries 93%
- Cardiac impairment in Long Covid 1-year post-SARS-CoV-2 infection 93%
- Which patients did recent trials in transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy select? -Insights from a prospective patient registry 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy -- The Impact of Age at Diagnosis of the Proband on Genetic Yield, Clinical Presentation, Outcomes, and Yield of Family Screening 97%
- Performance of a Protein Language Model for Variant Annotation in Cardiac Disease 94%
- Pathogenic and uncertain genetic variants have clinical cardiac correlates in diverse biobank participants 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reduced Expression of MTSS1 Increases Sarcomere Number and Improves Contractility in Select Forms of Monogenic DCM 91%
- Causal SNP regulating FAM13B expression identified for the Chr. 5q31 atrial fibrillation susceptibility loc 91%
- Systematic disruption of zebrafish fibrillin genes identifies a translational zebrafish model for Marfan syndrome 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.