Back

Effects of Statin Therapy in Patients Treated with Drug-Eluting and Drug-Coated Stents for Femoropopliteal Lesions: STAR-FP Study Outcomes

Takei, T.; Tokuda, T.; Yoshioka, N.; Ogata, K.; Tanaka, A.; Kojima, S.; Yamaguchi, K.; Yanagiuchi, T.; Nakama, T.

2024-09-07 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.09.06.24313216 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe effects of statins on drug-eluting stents (DESs) and drug-coated stents (DCSs) for femoropopliteal (FP) lesions are not well known. Therefore, this multicenter retrospective evaluated the impact of statins on DES and DCS patency. MethodsBetween January 2018 and December 2021, 449 patients were treated with DES and DCS at eight cardiovascular centers in Japan (LEADers FP registry). These lesions were divided into statin-treated and non-statin-treated arms. After propensity score matching, the effects of statins on DES and DCS were evaluated. The 2-year primary outcome measure was stent patency. The secondary outcomes included secondary patency, clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), limb salvage, major adverse limb events (MALE, CD-TLR+ major amputation), and a composite of overall survival and MALE or all-cause death at 2 years. ResultsAfter propensity score matching, the baseline and procedural characteristics did not differ significantly between the 135 patient pairs in the statin and non-statin groups. The primary patency at two years was significantly better in the statin group than in the non-statin group (86.9% vs. 75.1%, p=0.041). Regarding the secondary endpoints, the statin group demonstrated significantly superior secondary patency and freedom from MALE or all-cause mortality (95.5% vs. 87.0%, p=0.023 and 73.7% vs. 60.0%, p=0.012, respectively). ConclusionsThe results of this retrospective multicenter study demonstrated the superior primary patency in the statin group compared with the non-statin group at two years. These findings suggest that statins improve patency in patients undergoing DES and DCS.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.5%
2
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
3
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
4
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.2%
5
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
8.4%
6
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
8
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
9
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
10
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
12
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.7%
14
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
15
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
16
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
18
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
19
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
22
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
23
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
24
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%