Back

Evaluating noise correction approaches for non-invasive electrophysiology of the human spinal cord

Bailey, E.; Nierula, B.; Stephani, T.; Maess, B.; Nikulin, V.; Eippert, F.

2024-09-10 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.09.05.611423 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The spinal cord is a vital component of the central nervous system for the processing of sensorimotor information transmitted between the body and the brain. Electrospinography (ESG) is the most accessible non-invasive technique for recording spinal signals in humans, but the vast and detrimental impact of physiological noise (mostly of cardiac nature) has prevented widespread adoption. Here, we aim to address this issue by examining various denoising algorithms for cardiac artefact reduction - including principal component analysis-based techniques (PCA), independent component analysis-based approaches (ICA) and signal space projection (SSP). We observed that in situations where large numbers of spinal electrodes are used, SSP offers the best results in terms of balancing the removal of harmful noise and preserving neural information of interest. In cases where only a small number of electrodes are available, an approach based on PCA is deemed helpful. Approaches based on ICA were found to be unsuitable for cardiac artefact removal in ESG, due to a suboptimal balance of artefact removal and signal preservation. Finally, we also approached this issue from a signal-enhancement perspective and observed that in cases where extensive electrode arrays are used in the context of task-based designs, a spatial filtering technique based on canonical correlation analysis (CCA) reveals clear evoked spinal potentials even with single-trial resolution. Taken together, there are several appropriate algorithms for physiological noise removal in ESG, rendering this an accessible and easy-to-use technique for non-invasive assessments of human spinal cord function.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.