Back

Evaluating the Risk of Cardiovascular Adverse Events and Appendicitis After COVID-19 Diagnosis in Adults in the United States: Implications of the Start of Follow-Up

Layton, J. B.; Lindaas, A.; Muthuri, S. G.; Lloyd, P. C.; Richey, M. M.; Gruber, J. F.; Lyu, H.; McKillop, M. M.; Kowarski, L. S.; Bui, C.; Fisher, S. S.; Clarke, T. C.; Cheng, A. S.; Wan, Z.; Duenas, P. F.; Chen, Y.; Burrell, T.; Sheng, M.; Shoaibi, A.; Chillarige, Y.; Beers, J.; Anthony, M. S.; Forshee, R. A.; Anderson, S. A.

2024-09-06 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.09.05.24313134 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeThis study evaluated the association between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis and adverse events (AEs), including cardiovascular AEs and appendicitis, in US adults before the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines. Real-world studies of AEs after COVID-19 suggest that diagnoses of AEs and COVID-19 frequently occur on the same day and may be a source of bias. MethodsCohort and self-controlled risk interval (SCRI) designs were used in 2 US administrative claims data sources--Merative MarketScan(R) (ages 18-64 years) and Medicare (ages [≥] 65 years). AEs included stroke (nonhemorrhagic and hemorrhagic), acute myocardial infarction, myocarditis/pericarditis, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism (PE), disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), unusual-site and common-site thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, and appendicitis. In cohort analyses, weighted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) compared adults with a COVID-19 diagnosis and matched comparators. In SCRI analysis, relative incidences (RIs) and 95% CIs compared risk and reference windows within individuals. Analyses were performed starting follow-up on Time 0 and Day 1. ResultsFor cardiovascular AEs, all estimates starting follow-up on Day 1 were above 1.0 in both data sources. For cohort analyses, the strongest associations were for inpatient PE in both databases: MarketScan, HR=8.65 (95% CI, 6.06-12.35), Medicare HR=3.06 (95% CI, 2.88-3.26). For SCRI analyses, the strongest association in MarketScan was for DIC: RI=32.28 (95% CI, 17.06-61.09) and in Medicare was for myocarditis/pericarditis: RI=4.53 (95% CI, 3.89-5.27). AEs diagnosed concurrently with COVID-19 (ie, on Time 0) were common; including Time 0 in follow-up/risk windows resulted in higher RIs, as well as higher HRs for some AEs. However, some AEs (eg, stroke) were more common on Time 0 in the comparator group resulting in lower HRs. ConclusionCOVID-19 diagnoses had moderate to strong associations with cardiovascular AEs and weak or inconsistent associations with appendicitis, although estimates varied by design and methodology.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.