Back

Aberrant prefrontal activity and arousal level correlate with action initiation and response vigor

Klein, F.; Vasilev, D.; Iwai, R.; Watanabe, M.; Totah, N. K.

2024-09-08 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.09.04.611286 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Orchestrating learned Stimulus-Response (S-R) mappings has been suggested as one of the central functions of the prefrontal cortex (PFC). While S-R selective activity has been demonstrated, it remains unclear whether the strength of such activity is related to the vigor of the subsequent response. Here, we trained male rats to perform a Go/NoGo response task while head-fixed on a treadmill. This allowed us to record PFC (cingulate, area 24) single unit spiking, as well as running speed as a proxy for response vigor. We show that aberrant activation of the "wrong" S-R mapping is correlated with initiation of the incorrect response. The vigor of the incorrect response was directly related to the strength of the aberrant stimulus-evoked activity. A similar relationship was observed for pre-trial arousal state and response vigor. Our findings confirm the long-standing concept, established in psychology and cognitive neuroscience, that S-R mappings are directly related to response vigor. Moreover, we provide evidence for the often suggested but rarely tested relationship between arousal and response vigor and a potential underlying neuronal mechanism involving neuromodulation of S-R mapping activity. Significance statementThe concept of stimulus-response (S-R) mappings is fundamental in psychology and has been widely documented as a key function of the prefrontal cortex. Here, the authors directly link prefrontal single neuron mapping-selective activity to the vigor of responses. Moreover, they link a physiological measure of arousal to response vigor and suggest that neuromodulatory systems invigorate responses by potentially modulating PFC S-R mapping-selective activity.

Published in iScience (predicted rank #19) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.