Time spent in conversation over meals predicts default network function: Evidence from a passive mobile-sensing and fMRI study.
Bhatt, D.; Huckins, J. F.; Nepal, S.; Campbell, A. T.; Meyer, M.
Show abstract
Sharing meals with others, often referred to as commensality, fosters social connection and may have been essential to human brain evolution. Here, we investigate whether shared meals impact social brain processes through the conversations they afford. If so, then time spent in conversation over meals should affect the default network- a set of interconnected cortical regions reliably associated with the social exchange of ideas. To test this possibility, we combined passive-mobile sensing with neuroimaging. Undergraduate participants had an application on their smartphone for two months that unobtrusively captured their time spent in conversation, as well as their location on and around campus. In between these two months, participants completed a resting state scan. Time spent in conversations around meals (e.g., at cafeterias and restaurants) during the prior month predicted greater functional connectivity in the dorsomedial default network subsystem, specifically between the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) portion and the rest of the subsystem regions. This relationship was preferential to: (1) time spent in conversation over the past (vs. future) month, (2) connectivity with the LIFG (vs. other dorsomedial subsystem nodes), (3) the dorsomedial subsystem (vs. other default network subsystems), (4) eateries (vs. other locations), and (5) time spent around conversation at eateries, rather than time at eateries more generally. Follow-up analyses further revealed results were driven by a ventral portion of the LIFG, with peaks in voxel-connectivity associated with language, social, memory, and affective processes, as determined by the meta-analytic platform, NeuroSynth. Time spent in conversation over meals may exercise social cognitive processes supported by the dorsomedial subsystem, a network key to social communication, understanding, and connection.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Intrinsic functional connectivity among memory networks does not predict individual differences in narrative recall 96%
- Evidence for a Compensatory Relationship between Left- and Right-Lateralized Brain Networks 96%
- High performers demonstrate greater neural synchrony than low performers across behavioral domains 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.