Loss or redistribution? A better way of estimating regional changes in animal distribution and numbers caused by increased human activities
Mercker, M.; Peschko, V.; Borkenhagen, K.; Markones, N.; Schwemmer, H.; Dierschke, V.; Garthe, S.
Show abstract
O_LIA differentiated understanding of how regional human activities affect the spatial distribution and numbers of animals within specific areas of interest is of great ecological importance. Estimating these effects from empirical data is challenging however, because human activities can affect animals in qualitatively different ways and on different spatial and temporal scales. In addition, spatio-temporal animal abundance is frequently influenced by factors intrinsic and extrinsic to the area of interest, potentially confounding impact studies, e.g., based on trends. C_LIO_LIIn this study, we synergistically combined regression and mechanistic modelling to separate these different influences. We first used partial differential equations to simulate various potential animal redistribution patterns affected by regional human activities. We then selected appropriate patterns as predictors in regression-based species distribution models, together with additional anthropogenic and natural covariates. The simultaneous consideration of large-scale (number-conserving) animal reorganisation, their regional loss or gain, and the influence of additional environmental covariates eventually allowed the generation of qualitative and quantitative estimates and predictions of human-induced changes. C_LIO_LIWe exemplarily applied our approach to investigate the current and future impact of increasing offshore wind farm (OWF) implementation in the German North Sea on common murres (Uria aalge) during autumn. OWFs constructed up to 2019 reduced common murre numbers in German waters by 18.3%. If the planned OWF priority and reservation areas outlined in the German Marine Spatial Plan are implemented, the predicted loss would increase to 77.7%. Notably, these predictions did not include additional anthropogenic activities or further plans for OWF installation, which could together lead to the almost complete disappearance of common murres from the German North Sea. C_LIO_LIBy directly comparing predicted animal numbers and distributions in hypothetical scenarios with and without human pressures, the presented method allows us to measure and predict the effects of human activities on regional trends and large-scale reorganisation. This in turn helps us to quantify and predict the impact of planned human activities on wildlife, including in the context of the current rapid expansion of alternative energies. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatio-temporal patterns of whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in the Adriatic Sea under environmental forcing 94%
- Higher-order patterns of aquatic species spread through the global shipping network 94%
- Modeled buoyancy of eggs and larvae of the deep-sea shrimp Aristeus antennatus (Crustacea: Decapoda) in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Avoidance, confusion or solitude? Modelling how noise pollution affects whale migration 94%
- Linking movement and dive data to prey distribution models: new insights in foraging behaviour and potential pitfalls of movement analyses 93%
- The Statistical Building Blocks of Animal Movement Simulations 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modeling time-varying phytoplankton subsidy reveals at-risk species in a Chilean intertidal ecosystem 93%
- Emerging strains of watermelon mosaic virus in Southeastern France: model-based estimation of the dates and places of introduction 92%
- Harnessing testing strategies and public health measures to avert COVID-19 outbreaks during ocean cruises 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fine-scale spatiotemporal predator-prey interactions in an Antarctic fur seal colony 93%
- Biological and statistical interpretation of size-at-age, mixed-effects models of growth 92%
- Reports of deaths are an exaggeration: German (PCR-test-positive) fatality counts during the SARS-CoV-2 era in the context of all-cause mortality 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.