Back

Calibration of FRET-based biosensors using multiplexed biosensor barcoding

Wu, J.-W.; Yang, J.-M.; Chen, C.-C.; Au, G.; Wang, S.; Chern, G.-W.; Huang, C.-H.

2024-09-08 biophysics
10.1101/2024.09.04.610346 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET) between fluorescent proteins (FPs) is widely used in the design of genetically encoded fluorescent biosensors, which are powerful tools for monitoring the dynamics of biochemical activities in live cells. FRET ratio, defined as the ratio between acceptor and donor signals, is often used as a proxy for the actual FRET efficiency, which must be corrected for signal crosstalk using donor-only and acceptor-only samples. However, the FRET ratio is highly sensitive to imaging conditions, making direct comparisons across different experiments and over time challenging. Inspired by a method for multiplexed biosensor imaging using barcoded cells, we reasoned that calibration standards with fixed FRET efficiency can be introduced into a subset of cells for normalization of biosensor signals. Our theoretical analysis indicated that the FRET ratio of high-FRET species relative to non-FRET species slightly decreases at high excitation intensity, suggesting the need for calibration using both high and low FRET standards. To test these predictions, we created FRET donor-acceptor pairs locked in "FRET-ON" and "FRET-OFF" conformations and introduced them into a subset of barcoded cells. Our results confirmed the theoretical predictions and showed that the calibrated FRET ratio is independent of imaging settings. We also provided a strategy for calculating the FRET efficiency. Together, our study presents a simple strategy for calibrated and highly multiplexed imaging of FRET biosensors, facilitating reliable comparisons across experiments and supporting long-term imaging applications.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biophysical Reports
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
2
ACS Sensors
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
3
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
9.9%
4
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 12%
8.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.5%
6
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Biophysics and Physicobiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
8
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.3%
9
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
10
Methods
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.1%
12
Physical Biology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
14
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
Molecular Biology of the Cell
311 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
16
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.1%
18
Biochemistry
148 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.0%
21
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Nano Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
26
Talanta
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
27
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%