A Common Longitudinal Intensive Care Unit data Format (CLIF) to enable multi-institutional federated critical illness research
Rojas, J. C.; Lyons, P. G.; Chhikara, K.; Chaudhari, V.; Bhavani, S.; Nour, M. A.; Buell, K. G.; Smith, K. D.; Gao, C. A.; Amagai, S.; Mao, C.; Luo, Y.; Barker, A. K.; Nuppnau, M.; Beck, H.; Baccile, R.; Hermsen, M.; Liao, Z.; Park-Egan, B.; Carey, K. A.; Han, X.; Hochberg, C. H.; Ingraham, N. E.; Parker, W. F.
Show abstract
BackgroundCritical illness, or acute organ failure requiring life support, threatens over five million American lives annually. Electronic health record (EHR) data are a source of granular information that could generate crucial insights into the nature and optimal treatment of critical illness. However, data management, security, and standardization are barriers to large-scale critical illness EHR studies. MethodsA consortium of critical care physicians and data scientists from eight US healthcare systems developed the Common Longitudinal Intensive Care Unit (ICU) data Format (CLIF), an open-source database format that harmonizes a minimum set of ICU Data Elements for use in critical illness research. We created a pipeline to process adult ICU EHR data at each site. After development and iteration, we conducted two proof-of-concept studies with a federated research architecture: 1) an external validation of an in-hospital mortality prediction model for critically ill patients and 2) an assessment of 72-hour temperature trajectories and their association with mechanical ventilation and in-hospital mortality using group-based trajectory models. ResultsWe converted longitudinal data from 94,356 critically ill patients treated in 2020-2021 (mean age 60.6 years [standard deviation 17.2], 30% Black, 7% Hispanic, 45% female) across 8 health systems and 33 hospitals into the CLIF format, The in-hospital mortality prediction model performed well in the health system where it was derived (0.81 AUC, 0.06 Brier score). Performance across CLIF consortium sites varied (AUCs: 0.74-0.83, Brier scores: 0.06-0.01), and demonstrated some degradation in predictive capability. Temperature trajectories were similar across health systems. Hypothermic and hyperthermic-slow-resolver patients consistently had the highest mortality. ConclusionsCLIF facilitates efficient, rigorous, and reproducible critical care research. Our federated case studies showcase CLIFs potential for disease sub-phenotyping and clinical decision-support evaluation. Future applications include pragmatic EHR-based trials, target trial emulations, foundational multi-modal AI models of critical illness, and real-time critical care quality dashboards.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of a Derived International Patient Severity Algorithm to Support COVID-19 Analytics from Electronic Health Record Data 97%
- Real-Time Electronic Health Record Mortality Prediction During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Prospective Cohort Study 97%
- Clinical Utility of Automatable Prediction Models for Improving Palliative and End-Of-Life Care Outcomes: Towards Routine Decision Analysis Before Implementation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Prospective Implementation of a Large Language Model based System for Early Sepsis Prediction 94%
- Finding Long-COVID: Temporal Topic Modeling of Electronic Health Records from the N3C and RECOVER Programs 93%
- Novel clinical subphenotypes in COVID-19: derivation, validation, prediction, temporal patterns, and interaction with social determinants of health 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A deep learning model for clinical outcome prediction using longitudinal inpatient electronic health records 94%
- Development of a COVID-19 Application Ontology for the ACT Network 91%
- MMFP-Tableau: Enabling Precision Mitochondrial Medicine through Integration, Visualization, and Analytics of Clinical and Research Health System Electronic Data 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting Prognosis in COVID-19 Patients using Machine Learning and Readily Available Clinical Data 94%
- Personalized Predictive Models for Symptomatic COVID-19 Patients Using Basic Preconditions: Hospitalizations, Mortality, and the Need for an ICU or Ventilator 91%
- Image and structured data analysis for prognostication of health outcomes in patients presenting to the Emergency Department during the COVID-19 pandemic 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Generalizability Challenges of Mortality Risk Prediction Models: A Retrospective Analysis on a Multi-center Database 93%
- Identification of physiological adverse events using continuous vital signs monitoring during paediatric critical care transport: a novel data-driven approach 93%
- Predictability and Stability Testing to Assess Clinical Decision Instrument Performance for Children After Blunt Torso Trauma 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.