Back

A Common Longitudinal Intensive Care Unit data Format (CLIF) to enable multi-institutional federated critical illness research

Rojas, J. C.; Lyons, P. G.; Chhikara, K.; Chaudhari, V.; Bhavani, S.; Nour, M. A.; Buell, K. G.; Smith, K. D.; Gao, C. A.; Amagai, S.; Mao, C.; Luo, Y.; Barker, A. K.; Nuppnau, M.; Beck, H.; Baccile, R.; Hermsen, M.; Liao, Z.; Park-Egan, B.; Carey, K. A.; Han, X.; Hochberg, C. H.; Ingraham, N. E.; Parker, W. F.

2024-09-04 health informatics
10.1101/2024.09.04.24313058 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCritical illness, or acute organ failure requiring life support, threatens over five million American lives annually. Electronic health record (EHR) data are a source of granular information that could generate crucial insights into the nature and optimal treatment of critical illness. However, data management, security, and standardization are barriers to large-scale critical illness EHR studies. MethodsA consortium of critical care physicians and data scientists from eight US healthcare systems developed the Common Longitudinal Intensive Care Unit (ICU) data Format (CLIF), an open-source database format that harmonizes a minimum set of ICU Data Elements for use in critical illness research. We created a pipeline to process adult ICU EHR data at each site. After development and iteration, we conducted two proof-of-concept studies with a federated research architecture: 1) an external validation of an in-hospital mortality prediction model for critically ill patients and 2) an assessment of 72-hour temperature trajectories and their association with mechanical ventilation and in-hospital mortality using group-based trajectory models. ResultsWe converted longitudinal data from 94,356 critically ill patients treated in 2020-2021 (mean age 60.6 years [standard deviation 17.2], 30% Black, 7% Hispanic, 45% female) across 8 health systems and 33 hospitals into the CLIF format, The in-hospital mortality prediction model performed well in the health system where it was derived (0.81 AUC, 0.06 Brier score). Performance across CLIF consortium sites varied (AUCs: 0.74-0.83, Brier scores: 0.06-0.01), and demonstrated some degradation in predictive capability. Temperature trajectories were similar across health systems. Hypothermic and hyperthermic-slow-resolver patients consistently had the highest mortality. ConclusionsCLIF facilitates efficient, rigorous, and reproducible critical care research. Our federated case studies showcase CLIFs potential for disease sub-phenotyping and clinical decision-support evaluation. Future applications include pragmatic EHR-based trials, target trial emulations, foundational multi-modal AI models of critical illness, and real-time critical care quality dashboards.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.