Back

Mouse Brain Extractor: Brain segmentation of mouse MRI using global positional encoding and SwinUNETR

Kim, Y.; Hrncir, H.; Meyer, C. E.; Tabbaa, M.; Moats, R. A.; Levitt, P.; Harris, N. G.; MacKenzie-Graham, A. J.; Shattuck, D. W.

2024-09-08 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.09.03.611106 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In spite of the great progress that has been made towards automating brain extraction in human magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), challenges remain in the automation of this task for mouse models of brain disorders. Researchers often resort to editing brain segmentation results manually when automated methods fail to produce accurate delineations. However, manual corrections can be labor-intensive and introduce interrater variability. This motivated our development of a new deep-learning-based method for brain segmentation of mouse MRI, which we call Mouse Brain Extractor. We adapted the existing SwinUNETR architecture (Hatamizadeh et al., 2021) with the goal of making it more robust to scale variance. Our approach is to supply the network model with supplementary spatial information in the form of absolute positional encoding. We use a new scheme for positional encoding, which we call Global Positional Encoding (GPE). GPE is based on a shared coordinate frame that is relative to the entire input image. This differs from the positional encoding used in SwinUNETR, which solely employs relative pairwise image patch positions. GPE also differs from the conventional absolute positional encoding approach, which encodes position relative to a subimage rather than the entire image. We trained and tested our method on a heterogeneous dataset of N=223 mouse MRI, for which we generated a corresponding set of manually-edited brain masks. These data were acquired previously in other studies using several different scanners and imaging protocols and included in vivo and ex vivo images of mice with heterogeneous brain structure due to different genotypes, strains, diseases, ages, and sexes. We evaluated our methods results against those of seven existing rodent brain extraction methods and two state-of-the art deep-learning approaches, nnU-Net (Isensee et al., 2018) and SwinUNETR. Overall, our proposed method achieved average Dice scores on the order of 0.98 and average HD95 measures on the order of 100 {micro}m when compared to the manually-labeled brain masks. In statistical analyses, our method significantly outperformed the conventional approaches and performed as well as or significantly better than the nnU-Net and SwinUNETR methods. These results suggest that Global Positional Encoding provides additional contextual information that enables our Mouse Brain Extractor to perform competitively on datasets containing multiple resolutions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
14.6%
2
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
Aperture Neuro
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
4
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
8.4%
5
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.8%
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.2%
10
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.0%
11
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
12
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.5%
17
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
24
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
25
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%