Back

Legume genome structures and histories inferred from Cercis canadensis and Chamaecrista fasciculata genomes

Lee, H.-o.; Stai, J. S.; Xu, Q.; Hewavithana, T.; Batra, R.; Liu, A.; Jordan, B. D.; Walstead, R.; Jenkins, J. W.; Williams, M.; Webber, j.; Grimwood, J.; Lovell, J. T.; Bruna, T.; Shu, S.; Keymanesh, K.; Eichenberger, J.; Schmutz, J.; Goodstein, D. M.; Barry, K. W.; Sankoff, D.; Jin, L.; Leebens-Mack, J.; Cannon, S. B.

2024-09-08 genomics
10.1101/2024.09.03.611065 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIThe legume family originated ca. 70 million years ago and soon diversified into at least six lineages (now extant subfamilies). The signal of whole genome duplications (WGD) is apparent in species sampled from all six subfamilies. The early diversification has posed difficulties for resolving the legume backbone structure and the timing of WGDs. C_LIO_LIIn this study, we report the genome sequences and annotations for Cercis canadensis (Cercidoideae) and Chamaecrista fasciculata (Caesalpinoideae) to help resolve the relative taxonomic placements along the legume backbone, the timings of WGDs relative to subfamily origins, and the ancestral legume karyotype. C_LIO_LIAnalyses of genome assemblies from four subfamilies within Fabaceae show that the last common ancestor of all legumes likely had seven chromosomes, with a genome structure similar to the extant Cercis genome. Our analysis supports an allopolyploid origin of the subfamily Caesalpinoideae, with progenitors involving lineages along the backbone of the legume phylogeny. C_LIO_LIA probable allopolyploid origin of Caesalpinoideae subfamily provides a partial explanation for the difficulty in resolving the structure of the legume backbone. The retained karyotype structure and lack of a WGD in the last 100+ Mya, underscore the utility of the Cercis genome as an ancestral reference for the legume family. C_LI

Published in The Plant Journal (predicted rank #3) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.