Back

Decoupling Coldness and Softness in Tactile Wetness Perception Using Tunable Hydrogels

Becerra, L. L.; Root, N.; Clark, A.; Rafeedi, T.; Brown, W.; Chen, A. X.; Qie, Y.; Blau, R.; Miller, J.; Kapadia, K.; Ng, T. N.; Rouw, R.; Lipomi, D. J.

2024-09-05 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.09.03.611060 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This study investigates the perception of tactile wetness, a complex sensation experienced by humans. Previous research has primarily focused on either thermal or mechanical cues separately, or has used textiles as stimuli whose parameters are difficult to control. Here, we employed polyacrylamide hydrogels with varying stiffness levels soaked in liquids of distinct thermal conductivities. By psychophysically evaluating participants perception of wetness, we showed that the wetness judgments for the samples exhibit a transitive relationship based on the mechanical and thermal cues from an intrinsically tunable organic material. We developed a prediction model of human wetness judgment with an accuracy of 90% and found that the best metrics for the most accurate model were those that were the most human-adjacent: change in temperature at the skin-sample interface (thermal) and compressive force from 2 mm indentation of the sample (mechanical). Given these parameters, we developed a perceptual space capable of recreating 7 distinct levels of wetness perception with the physical parameters used in this study. The results provide insights into the relative contributions of mechanical and thermal stimulus properties in wetness perception. Most notably, this work highlights that the physical characteristics of the skin-stimulus interface can provide ample information for creating a wetness perceptual space, as opposed to the chemical composition of the hydrogels.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
9.4%
3
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.0%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.5%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.1%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.1%
7
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.7%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 32%
2.7%
9
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
10
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.9%
12
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
13
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
16
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
17
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
18
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.4%
19
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
20
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
21
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
22
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
24
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
25
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
Langmuir
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
29
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%