Development of a national osteopathic practice-based research network: the NCOR Research Network
Draper-Rodi, J.; Fawkes, C.; Bailey, D.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo describe the development of the NCOR Research Network, the first osteopathic Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN) in the UK, and provide data on its members characteristics, clinical practices, and patient demographics. DesignCross-sectional survey study. SettingOnline survey of osteopaths practising in the United Kingdom. Participants570 osteopaths registered with the General Osteopathic Council who consented to participate in the NCOR Research Network. Primary and secondary outcome measuresDemographic characteristics of osteopaths, details of their clinical practice, patient demographics, common presenting complaints, treatment approaches, and attitudes towards evidence-based practice. ResultsThe median age bracket of participants was 50-59 years, with 55% identifying as women. Participants had a median of 17 years of clinical experience. Most worked in private practice (71% as principals, 32% as associates), seeing 20-39 hours of patients per week. The majority (87%) regularly treated adults aged 65 or older. Low back pain was the most common complaint seen daily (56%). Spinal articulation/mobilization (79%) and soft tissue massage (78%) were the most frequently used techniques. Participants reported positive views towards evidence-based practice but cited lack of research skills and time as barriers to engagement. ConclusionsThe NCOR Research Network provides a foundation for future osteopathic research in the UK. While the sample was not fully representative of UK osteopaths, it offers insights into current osteopathic practice. The network aims to foster collaboration between clinicians and academics, potentially bridging the gap between research and practice in osteopathy. Protocol registrationhttps://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HPWG4 Article summaryStrengths and limitations of this study: O_LIThis study establishes the first osteopathic Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN) in the UK, providing a novel infrastructure for collaborative research in osteopathy. C_LIO_LIThe survey was developed based on previous PBRN studies and existing UK osteopathic datasets, allowing for comparability of data across different research initiatives. C_LIO_LIA diverse recruitment strategy was employed, including various channels such as the regulatory body, professional organisations, and both face-to-face and online presentations, to reach a wide range of osteopaths. C_LIO_LIThe sample in this study is not fully representative of the UK osteopathic profession when compared to the General Osteopathic Council registrant data, which may limit the generalisability of the findings. C_LIO_LIAs the survey data were self-reported by osteopaths, the findings may be subject to recall or social desirability biases. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- UK osteopathic practice in 2019: a retrospective analysis of practice data 99%
- Acceptability of a nurse-led non-pharmacological complex intervention for knee pain: Nurse and patient views and experiences 96%
- Lower limb chronic edema management program: Perspectives of disengaged patients on challenges, enablers and barriers to program attendance and adherence 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Doctors of chiropractic working with or within integrated health care delivery systems: a scoping review protocol 95%
- Barriers and facilitators to implementing core osteoarthritis treatments in China: a mixed-method study 95%
- Predicting pain and function outcomes in people consulting with shoulder pain: The PANDA-S clinical cohort and qualitative study protocol (ISRCTN 46948079) 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Study of Patients undergoing Trigger Finger Release Surgery in a Primary Care setting – Organisational Capabilities, Outcomes and Benefits 96%
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 94%
- Patients’ perspectives on ecologically sustainable healthcare in general practice 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation of predictive risk stratification to reduce emergency admissions to hospital: experiences of general practitioners and practice managers 93%
- Are Dutch General Practitioners willing to prescribe mifepristone and misoprostol?: a mixed-methods study 92%
- Factors influencing focused practice: A qualitative study of resident and early-career family physician practice choices 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Scoping Review of Deaf Awareness Programs in Health Professional Education 92%
- A qualitative study on factors influencing health workers’ uptake of a pilot surgical antibiotic prophylaxis stewardship programme in selected Georgian hospitals 91%
- Determinants of practice location choices among physicians and medical students in Mali: insights into addressing medical deserts through evidence-based strategies 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.