Refining Brain Stimulation Therapies: An Active Learning Approach to Personalization
Sendi, M. S.; Core, E.; Piallat, B.; Ellis, C. A.; Eggers, T. E.; Laxpati, N. G.; Mahmoudi, B.; Gutekunst, C.-A.; Devergnas, A. D.; Mayberg, H. S.; Gross, R. E.; Calhoun, V.
Show abstract
Brain stimulation holds promise for treating brain disorders, but personalizing therapy remains challenging. Effective treatment requires establishing a functional link between stimulation parameters and brain response, yet traditional methods like random sampling (RS) are inefficient and costly. To overcome this, we developed an active learning (AL) framework that identifies optimal relationships between stimulation parameters and brain response with fewer experiments. We validated this framework through three experiments: (1) in silico modeling with synthetic data from a Parkinsons disease model, (2) in silico modeling with real data from a non-human primate, and (3) in vivo modeling with a real-time rat optogenetic stimulation experiment. In each experiment, we compared AL models to RS models, using various query strategies and stimulation parameters (amplitude, frequency, pulse width). AL models consistently outperformed RS models, achieving lower error on unseen test data in silico (p<0.0056, N=1,000) and in vivo (p=0.0036, N=20). This approach represents a significant advancement in brain stimulation, potentially improving both research and clinical applications by making them more efficient and effective. Our findings suggest that AL can substantially reduce the cost and time required for developing personalized brain stimulation therapies, paving the way for more effective and accessible treatments for brain disorders.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Irregular optogenetic stimulation waveforms can induce naturalistic patterns of hippocampal spectral activity 97%
- Robust and accurate decoding of hand kinematics from entire spiking activity using deep learning 95%
- NeurostimML: A machine learning model for predicting neurostimulation-induced tissue damage 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Flexible and Stable Cycle-by-Cycle Phase-Locked Deep Brain Stimulation System Targeting Brain Oscillations in the Management of Movement Disorders 95%
- Real-time suppression and amplification of frequency-specific neural activity using stimulation evoked oscillations 95%
- Temporal interference stimulation targets deep brain regions by modulating neural oscillations 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Personalized Closed-Loop Brain Stimulation for Effective Neurointervention Across Participants 96%
- Selection of stimulus parameters for enhancing slow wave sleep events with a Neural-field theory thalamocortical computational model 95%
- Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) triggers dose-dependent homeostatic rewiring in recurrent neuronal networks 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating electric field modelling and neuroimaging to explain inter-individual variability of tACS effects 94%
- Electric field dynamics in the brain during multi-electrode transcranial electric stimulation 93%
- Real-Time Brain-Machine Interface Achieves High-Velocity Prosthetic Finger Movements using a Biologically-Inspired Neural Network Decoder 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inferring entire spiking activity from local field potentials with deep learning 95%
- Multivariate pattern classification on BOLD activation pattern induced by deep brain stimulation in motor, associative, and limbic brain networks 94%
- Discrimination of finger movements by magnetomyography with optically pumped magnetometers 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.