Back

The Enhanced Activation of Innate Immunity in Drosophila S2 Cells by Micrococcus luteus is Mediated by Relish

Kachaev, Z. M.; Ghassah, M.; Musabirov, A. A.; Shaposhnikov, A. V.; IToropygin, I. Y.; Polunina, Y. A.; Stepanov, N. G.; Chmykhalo, V. K.; Shidlovskii, Y.

2024-09-02 molecular biology
10.1101/2024.09.02.610512 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The IMD and Toll signaling pathways in Drosophila melanogaster mediate the innate immune responses to Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria and fungi, respectively. Here we studied the involvement of the NF-{kappa}B transcription factor Relish, which is a mediator of the IMD pathway, in the humoral immune response to the Gram-positive bacteria Micrococcus luteus and Bacillus subtilis and the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae, using D. melanogaster S2 cells as a model. Activation of Relish proteolysis was observed after S2 cell treatment with the control Gram-negative bacterium Escherichia coli. We found that M. luteus had also a noticeable effect on Relish activation, while B. subtilis and M. anisopliae effects were modest. Activation patterns of the genes encoding predominantly the IMD-pathway-dependent antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and peptidoglycan recognition proteins (PGRPs), as well as the levels of Relish recruitment to the promoters of the genes, were found to be very similar in S2 cells treated with E. coli or M. luteus but were lower and differed in the case of B. subtilis and M. anisopliae. A Relish knockdown (KD) decreased the induction levels observed for all AMP and some PGRP genes in response to M. luteus treatment and the induction levels observed for several AMP genes after M. anisopliae and B. subtilis exposures. Therefore, our findings suggest that Relish plays a critical role in inducing the humoral immune response in Drosophila S2 cells, contributing primarily to the response against M. luteus and, to a lesser extent, to the responses against B. subtilis and M. anisopliae.

Matching journals

The top 14 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
7.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.4%
4
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
5
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
6
Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
7
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.1%
8
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
9
Molecular Immunology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
13
General and Comparative Endocrinology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
14
Cell Death Discovery
51 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
50% of probability mass above
15
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
16
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
17
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Developmental & Comparative Immunology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
19
Journal of Biosciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
20
Insect Molecular Biology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.4%
22
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.4%
23
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.0%
25
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
26
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
28
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%