Structural Adaptations of HepI Enzymes in Proteobacteria: Insights into Evolutionary Resilience and Functional Dynamics
Gupta, A. M.; Butelman, J. W.; Hassan, B. A.; Arevalo, P.; Taylor, E. A.
Show abstract
Since lipopolysaccharide molecules are highly variable in their structure while also being essential for bacterial cell survival, we hypothesized that enzymes involved in its biosynthesis may exhibit differences that could be used to predict the likelihood of survival in different ecological niches. We examined the sequence variability of orthologues of Heptosyltransferase I (HepI), which is found in all lipopolysaccharide (LPS) containing Gram-negative bacteria. We identified two different sequence motifs within the N-terminal domain of HepI, which correlated with differences in the Lipid A portion of the LPS. Further, we compared the protein structure of HepI from Escherichia coli with a structural model we generated that incorporated the alternate sequence motif. Molecular dynamics simulations of these two proteins, recapitulated our findings, that proteins with the E. coli-like sequence motif maintained a larger enzyme active site, while the mutated structural model undergoes rearrangements that lead to a smaller N-terminal active site pocket. This work revealed sequence-structure-function relationships that can be used to determine if a species incorporates a Heptose residue onto Lipid A chains containing one or two 3-deoxy-D-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid (Kdo) residues. Since research suggests that the number of Kdo residues in LPS impacts the overall immune response to the LPS endotoxin, this work could aid in our understanding of the pathogenic effects of human-bacterial interactions. Understanding the sequence-structural adaptations of HepI enzymes across proteobacteria sheds light on their evolutionary resilience and functional versatility. HighlightsO_LILipopolysaccharide (LPS) structure varies between organisms C_LIO_LIHeptosytransferase I sequence motifs allow prediction of LPS structural features C_LIO_LIAdaptations of HepI enzymes reveal evolutionary resilience and functional versatility C_LI
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Conserved conformational hierarchy across functionally divergent glycosyltransferases of the GT-B structural superfamily as determined from microsecond molecular dynamics 96%
- The Solvation of the E. coli CheY Phosphorylation SiteMapped by XFMS 96%
- Structural distortions induced by Kinase Inhibiting RNase Attenuator (KIRA) compounds prevent the formation of face-to-face dimers of Inositol Requiring Enzyme 1α 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Large-scale, dynamin-like motions of the human guanylate binding protein 1 revealed by multi-resolution simulations 96%
- A disordered encounter complex is central to the yeast Abp1p SH3 domain binding pathway 95%
- Evolution of tunnels in alpha/beta-hydrolase fold proteins - what can we learn from studying epoxide hydrolases? 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular dynamics simulations of the Spike trimeric ectodomain of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant: structural relationships with infectivity, evasion to immune system and transmissibility 96%
- Investigating the role of N-terminal domain in phosphodiesterase 4B-inhibition by molecular dynamics simulation 94%
- Molecular and functional characterization of buffalo nasal epithelial odorant binding proteins and their structural insights by in-silico and biochemical approach 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A computational study of the fold and stability of cytochrome c with implications for disease 97%
- A Mathematical Genomics Perspective on the Moonlighting Role of Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (GAPDH) 94%
- The Distal-Proximal Relationships Among the Human Moonlighting Proteins: Evolutionary hotspots and Darwinian checkpoints 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.