Identification of multimodal mental health signatures in the young population using deep phenotyping
Moerch, N.; Calderon, A. B.; Kvamme, T. L.; Donskov, J. G.; Zana, B.; Durand, S.; Bjekic, J.; Machizawa, M. G.; Yamada, M.; Ottosson, F.; Bybjerg-Grauholm, J.; Ernst, M.; Boerglum, A. D.; Sandberg, K.; Qvist, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundMental health comprises emotional, psychological, and social dimensions, extending beyond the mere absence of illness. Shaped by a complex interplay of hereditary factors and life experiences, mental health can deteriorate into clinical conditions necessitating intervention. However, ambiguity between pathological and non-pathological states underscores the need for a dimensional approach to early risk detection and stratified psychiatry. MethodsWe analyzed multimodal data from approximately 300 young adults, including psychometric assessments, structural brain imaging, genomic data, and fasting-state plasma metabolomics. Using a psychometry-based soft-clustering approach (archetyping), we stratified participants based on cognitive, emotional, and behavioral traits. We evaluated associations between archetypes, biological features, and mental health outcomes both cross-sectionally and at five-year follow-up. ResultsWe identified five psychometric archetypes, capturing diverse psychological profiles that span a continuum from vulnerability to resilience. Archetypes at the vulnerable end, which were marked by emotional dysregulation and high neuroticism, were associated with elevated polygenic risk for psychiatric disorders, altered cortical structures in emotion-related regions, and metabolomic profiles previously linked to psychopathology. By contrast, resilient archetypes were characterized by emotional stability and adaptive functioning. Archetype scores were prospectively associated with symptom burden, and models guided by archetype-associated biological features outperformed agnostic models in predicting clinical outcomes, supporting their clinical relevance. ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that data-driven psychometric archetypes reflect biologically grounded variation in mental health and can inform prospective risk stratification. This approach offers a framework for understanding mental health heterogeneity and holds promise for advancing early screening and targeted interventions in the young population.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Are psychiatric disorders risk factors for COVID-19 susceptibility and severity? a two-sample, bidirectional, univariable and multivariable Mendelian Randomization study 96%
- Genetic liability to major psychiatric disorders contributes to multi-faceted quality of life outcomes in children and adults 96%
- Distinguishing clinical and genetic risk factors for suicidal ideation and behavior in a diverse hospital population 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunological Drivers and Potential Novel Drug Targets for Major Psychiatric, Neurodevelopmental, and Neurodegenerative Conditions 96%
- A Genetic Atlas of Relationships Between Circulating Metabolites and Liability to Psychiatric Conditions 96%
- Epigenetic and Genetic Profiling of Comorbidity Patterns among Substance Dependence Diagnoses 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Polygenic architecture of brain structure and function, behaviors, and psychopathologies in children 97%
- Genetic variants associated with cross-disorder and disorder-specific risk for psychiatric disorders are enriched at epigenetically active sites in peripheral lymphoid cells 96%
- Neuropsychiatric mutations delineate functional brain connectivity dimensions contributing to autism and schizophrenia 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- GWAS of Over 427,000 Individuals Establishes GABAergic and Synaptic Molecular Pathways as Key for Cognitive Executive Functions 95%
- Polygenic analyses show important differences between MDD symptoms collected using PHQ9 and CIDI-SF 95%
- Heterogeneity in Depression: evidence for distinct clinical and neurobiological profiles 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.