How do self-fertilising and facultative sexual populations differ in mutation accumulation?
Kopcak, D.; Hartfield, M.
Show abstract
Self-fertilisation and asexual reproduction are both hypothesised to cause long-term extinction due to inefficient selection against deleterious mutations. Self-fertilisation can counter these effects through creating homozygous genotypes and purging deleterious mutations. Although complete asexuality lacks meiotic gene exchange, mitotic gene conversion creates homozygous regions that could limit deleterious mutation accumulation in an analogous manner. We compare mutation accumulation in self-fertilising and facultative sexual populations subject to mitotic gene conversion, and quantify the efficacy of purging in the latter. We first show analytically that purging is most effective with high levels of asexuality and gene conversion, and when deleterious mutations are recessive. We further show using simulations that, when mitotic gene conversion becomes sufficiently high in obligate asexuals, there is a reduction in the mutation count and a jump in homozygosity, reflecting purging. These effects are stronger than predicted from single-locus models, demonstrating how multi-locus purging can further reduce mutation prevalence in asexuals. However, this mechanism is not necessarily as efficient at purging under high self-fertilisation, and elevated rates of mitotic gene conversion seem to be needed for widespread purging compared to empirical estimates. Significance StatementAsexuality has been argued to be an evolutionary dead end, due to a lack of gene exchange causing inefficient selection acting against deleterious mutations. It has been proposed that asexuals can counter these negative effects through mitotic gene conversion, which exposes mutations to selection within individual lineages. Here, we theoretically investigate how effective this mechanism is. We compare results to those obtained when individuals reproduce by self-fertilisation, which has similar effects on exposing deleterious variants. While mitotic gene conversion can be effective in removing recessive deleterious mutations, high rates are required and it is not always as effective as selfing.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Hidden genetic variance contributes to increase the short-term adaptive potential of selfing populations 98%
- Hoisted with his own petard: how sex-ratio meiotic drive in Drosophila affinis creates resistance alleles that limit its spread 97%
- Selfish migrants: How a meiotic driver is selected to increase dispersal 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reproductive compensation and selection among viable embryos drive the evolution of polyembryony 97%
- The effect of genetic architecture and selfing on the capacity of a population to expand its range 97%
- On deleterious mutations in perennials: inbreeding depression, mutation load and life-history evolution 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.