De novo design of Ras isoform selective binders
Zhang, J. Z.; Li, X.; Liu, C.; Jiang, H.; Wu, K.; Baker, D.
Show abstract
The proto-oncogene Ras which governs diverse intracellular pathways has four major isoforms (KRAS4A, KRAS4B, HRAS, and NRAS) with substantial sequence homology and similar in vitro biochemistry. There is considerable interest in investigating the roles of these independently as their association with different cancers vary, but there are few Ras isoform-specific binding reagents as the only significant sequence differences are in their disordered and highly charged C-termini which have been difficult to elicit antibodies against. To overcome this limitation, we use deep learning-based methods to de novo design Ras isoform-specific binders (RIBs) for all major Ras isoforms that specifically target the Ras C-terminus. The RIBs bind to their target Ras isoforms both in vitro and in cells with remarkable specificity, disrupting their membrane localization and inhibiting Ras activity, and should contribute to dissecting the distinct roles of Ras isoforms in biology and disease.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Allosteric coupling asymmetry mediates paradoxical activation of BRAF by type II inhibitors 95%
- Identification of a conserved neutralizing epitope present on spike proteins from all highly pathogenic coronaviruses 94%
- Identification of Suitable Target/E3 Ligase Pairs for PROTAC Development using a Rapamycin-induced Proximity Assay (RiPA) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence of antigenic drift in the fusion machinery core of SARS-CoV-2 spike 94%
- An In Vitro BRAF Activation Assay Elucidates Molecular Mechanisms Driving the Disassembly of the Autoinhibited BRAF State 94%
- Cyclic peptides can engage a single binding pocket through multiple, entirely divergent modes 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.