Back

5UTR translational inhibition of neuroblastoma dependency factors using the CR-1-31-B rocaglate

Nunes, C.; Bekaert, S.-L.; Parsa, S.; Nelen, I.; Martens, F.; De Stanchina, E.; Sanders, E.; Hilgert, E.; T'sas, S.; Zhao, P.; De Vloed, F.; Eggermont, A.; Goossens, S.; Sablina, A.; Depestel, L.; Wendel, H. G.; Durinck, K.

2024-08-30 cancer biology
10.1101/2024.08.29.610236 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Current therapies for neuroblastoma are often ineffective and survivors suffer from severe long-term therapy related side-effects, underscoring the need for identification of novel drugging strategies. We performed an in-depth evaluation of phenotypic and molecular responses following exposure of neuroblastoma cells to the rocaglate CR-1-31-B, scrutinizing its mode-of-action through integrative ribosome footprinting and shotgun proteome profiling. We could show that CR-1-31-B significantly reduces tumor growth in vivo without apparent toxicity. By means of combined ribosome footprinting and transcriptome analysis we uncovered that CR-1-31-B treatment downregulates translation efficiencies of several major neuroblastoma dependencies including MYCN, CCND1 and ALK as well as factors involved in the G2/M checkpoint. Upregulated targets are enriched for oxidative phosphorylation pathway components and DNA repair. At the proteome level, CR-1-31-B imposed downregulation of a FOXM1 driven signature, including the FOXM1 target gene TPX2. We show that neuroblastoma cells are dependent on TPX2 for growth and DNA repair and further demonstrate enhanced CHK1 sensitivity upon TPX2 knockdown. Next, we also observed synergistic effects of CHK1 inhibition with CR-1-31-B. In conclusion, our data support CR-1-31-B as a potent novel therapeutic agent in neuroblastoma, in particular in combination with DNA damage or replication stress inducing agents.

Matching journals

The top 16 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.