Back

Imaging the interactions of chimeric antigen receptor-expressing T-cells with colorectal cancer cells

Banik, D.; Ward, C.; Zhang, Z.; Heraghty, D.; Suresh, P.; Li, B.; Kedia, S.; Davis, S.; Roy, J.; Chapman, M.; Mahata, B.; Klenerman, D.

2024-08-30 immunology
10.1101/2024.08.29.610222 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown unprecedented success in haematological cancers but faces challenges in solid tumours. Although carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 5 (CEACAM5) is differentially expressed in many solid tumours, anti-CEACAM5 CAR T-cells are ineffective. Here, we have studied the interaction of CEACAM5 targeting primary CAR T-cells with colorectal cancer (CRC) cells using fluorescence microscopy. We found that CRC cells glycocalyx is much deeper than that of the CAR T cell causing delayed activation. Oscillating calcium fluxes, indicative of non-sustained CAR T cell activation and reduced cytotoxicity, were observed when CAR T cells interacted with CRC cells, which increased with increasing cell-seeding time. Imaging revealed that this effect correlated with a progressive loss of accessible CEACAM5 antigen on the CRC cell surface, possibly due to their sequestration in the intercellular junction, rendering CAR T cell engagement less effective. Local proteolytic treatment with trypsin to disrupt the CRC cell monolayer, using a micropipette, increased CEACAM5 availability, decreased glycocalyx thickness, and restored sustained CAR T cell calcium fluxes, increasing the killing of CRC cells. Similar enhanced interaction was observed after treatment of CRC cell monolayer with hyaluronidase, approved for use in humans. We observed limited availability of CEACAM5 on human colorectal cancer tissues, whereas treatment with trypsin or hyaluronidase increased accessibility. Our results reveal why CAR T cells targeting CEACAM5 are ineffective and suggest possible routes to improved therapy for CRC.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.