The CONSIDER Intervention Fidelity Framework for Complex Interventions in Healthcare: A Best-Fit Framework Synthesis
Paez, A.; Nunan, D.; McCulloch, P.; Beard, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe focus of clinical trials is typically interventions efficacy, or whether they attain their desired outcomes. Comparatively less attention is focused on understanding how or why interventions succeed, or fail to attain, those outcomes. This may be particularly important in trials of complex interventions such as surgery or physiotherapy, which are multifaceted and often tailored to individual participants, providers, or settings, increasing the potential for variations in intervention delivery and effects. The correspondence between the intervention that was planned and what was actually delivered in a trial is the interventions fidelity. Several benefits for high levels of intervention fidelity have been proposed. However, a lack of a uniform definition for fidelity and its key components may hinder intervention delivery in clinical trials and the translation of evidence-based interventions to clinical practice. MethodsIn this study, we undertook systematic review, and "Best-fit" framework synthesis to develop an empirically-based intervention fidelity framework for complex interventions in rehabilitation. ResultsThe resulting CONSIDER (Complex iNterventionS Design dElivery Recepit) framework is first integrated fidelity framework developed specifically for clinical trials of for complex interventions rehabiliation. CONSIDER consists of three main components, Design, Delivery and Receipt and the factors moderating them. Design encompasses the core elements of the intervention and the protocol for the clinical trial to evaluate its effectiveness. Delivery encompasses the actual implementation of the protocol and treatment integrity. It is focused primarily on the actions of the intervention providers. Receipt addresses the exposure of the trial participants to the intervention and their response to it. ConclusionsThis fidelity framework is the first designed suit the unique complexities and challenges presented by physical complex interventions. It can help promote transparency and reproducibility and helps researchers design clinical trials that reduce waste, enable uptake into clinical practice, and benefit the practice and evidencing of physiotherapy, surgery and other physical complex interventions.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The devil is in the details: Reporting and transparent research practices in sports medicine and orthopedic clinical trials 95%
- Face-to-face interventions to encourage enrolment in cardiac rehabilitation; a scoping review protocol 95%
- A text messaging intervention to support patients with chronic pain during prescription opioid tapering: protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating the use of a one-page infographic to improve recruitment and retention to the BASIL+ Randomised Controlled Trial: A Study Within a Trial (SWAT) 94%
- Supervised and self-directed technology-based dual-task exercise training programme for older adults at risk of falling – Protocol for a feasibility study 94%
- Perceived facilitators and barriers among physical therapists and orthopedic surgeons to pre-operative home-based exercise with one exercise-only in patients with severe knee osteoarthritis: A qualitative interview study nested in the QUADX-1 trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence-Based, Cost-Effective Interventions To Suppress The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 92%
- Is artificial intelligence for medical professionals serving the patients? Protocol for a mixed method systematic review on patient-relevant benefits and harms of algorithmic decision-making 91%
- Community mobilisation approaches to preventing and reducing adolescent multiple risk behaviour: a realist review protocol 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of osteotomy technique (flat-cut vs wedge-cut Weil) on pain relief and complication incidence following surgical treatment for patients presenting with metatarsalgia in a private metropolitan clinic: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial 92%
- Development of a consensus extension of the estimands framework for cluster randomised trials (CRT-estimands): results from an international Delphi study 92%
- Moderate-Intensity Exercise Versus High-Intensity Interval Training to Recover Walking Post-Stroke: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review And DEcision Making (MyComrade) study: A protocol for a cross-border pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 92%
- Improving cardiovascular health in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: Development of the Cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with aneurysms (CRISP) behaviour change intervention 92%
- Real-time Auditory Feedback for Improving Gait and Walking in People with Parkinson’s Disease: A Pilot and Feasibility Trial 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.